Answer:
Part(a): the capacitance is 0.013 nF.
Part(b): the radius of the inner sphere is 3.1 cm.
Part(c): the electric field just outside the surface of inner sphere is 
.
Explanation:
We know that if 'a' and 'b' are the inner and outer radii of the shell respectively, 'Q' is the total charge contains by the capacitor subjected to a potential difference of 'V' and '
' be the permittivity of free space, then the capacitance (C) of the spherical shell can be written as
Part(a):
Given, charge contained by the capacitor Q = 3.00 nC and potential to which it is subjected to is V = 230V.
So the capacitance (C) of the shell is
Part(b):
Given the inner radius of the outer shell b = 4.3 cm = 0.043 m. Therefore, from equation (1), rearranging the terms,
Part(c):
If we apply Gauss' law of electrostatics, then
Magnitude of normal force acting on the block is 7 N
Explanation:
10N = 1.02kg
Mass of the block = m = 1.02 kg
Angle of incline Θ
= 30°
Normal force acting on the block = N
From the free body diagram,
N = mgCos Θ
N = (1.02)(9.81)Cos(30)
N = 8.66 N
Rounding off to nearest whole number,
N = 7 N
Magnitude of normal force acting on the block = 7 N
<span>3) Neither precise or accurate.
This is because of the deviation between the measurements, they vary and are not within a good range. And they are not close to the accepted value. In order to be precise the measurements have to be relatively close to each other, and to be accurate they have to be close to the accepted value.</span>
F=ma, so 100=m×10. Solve for m by dividing by 10. The mass is 10 kg.
Answer: hope it helps you...❤❤❤❤
Explanation: If your values have dimensions like time, length, temperature, etc, then if the dimensions are not the same then the values are not the same. So a “dimensionally wrong equation” is always false and cannot represent a correct physical relation.
No, not necessarily.
For instance, Newton’s 2nd law is F=p˙ , or the sum of the applied forces on a body is equal to its time rate of change of its momentum. This is dimensionally correct, and a correct physical relation. It’s fine.
But take a look at this (incorrect) equation for the force of gravity:
F=−G(m+M)Mm√|r|3r
It has all the nice properties you’d expect: It’s dimensionally correct (assuming the standard traditional value for G ), it’s attractive, it’s symmetric in the masses, it’s inverse-square, etc. But it doesn’t correspond to a real, physical force.
It’s a counter-example to the claim that a dimensionally correct equation is necessarily a correct physical relation.
A simpler counter example is 1=2 . It is stating the equality of two dimensionless numbers. It is trivially dimensionally correct. But it is false.
