Speed is equal to distance traveled divided by the time. So it's 3.5 m/s
The process of arriving at a general conclusion based on the observation of specific examples is called inductive reasoning. It is a logical process where multiple premises are combined to obtain a conclusion. It is <span>used in applications that involve prediction and forecasting.</span>
Explanation:
It is given that,
Velocity in East,
Velocity in North,
(a) The resultant velocity is given by :
(b) The width of the river is, d = 80 m
Let t is the time taken by the boat to travel shore to shore. So,
t = 16 seconds
(c) Let x is the distance covered by the boat to reach the opposite shore. So,
x = 48 meters
Hence, this is the required solution.
This is a bad hypothesis because it's a statement. It is a description of what occurs, not a question that you will experiment upon to find an answer whether or not something will or will not be true.
Let's write the equations of motion on both x- (horizontal) and y- (vertical) axis. On the x-axis, it's a uniform motion with constant velocity vx. On the y-axis, it is a uniformly accelerated motion with initial height h=90 m and acceleration of
pointing down (so with a negative sign):
First, let's find the time at which the jumper reaches the ground. This happens when Sy(t)=0:
and so
Then, we can find the horizontal speed. In fact, we know that at the time t=4.28 s, when the jumper reached the ground, he covered exactly 180 m, so Sx=180 m. Using this into the law of motion in x, we find