Answer:
moving the boxes and the furniture up to the fifth floor.
Explanation:
The work done when moving an object up or down is equal to its change of gravitational potential energy:

where
m is the mass of the object
g is the gravitational acceleration
is the change in height of the object
We have two opposite situations:
1) when an object is moved upward,
is positive, so the work done W is positive as well: this means that we need to do work in order to move the object, because we have to "win" the effect of gravity, which pulls the object downward
2) when an object is moved downward,
is negative, so the work done W is negative as well: this means that we do not need to do work on the object, because it is already done by gravity, which pulls the object downward.
Therefore, more work is done when we are moving the boxes and the furniture up to the fifth floor.
Since the temperature of the gas remains constant in the process, we can use Boyle's law, which states that for a gas transformation at constant temperature, the product between the gas pressure and its volume is constant:

which can also be rewritten as

(1)
where the labels 1 and 2 mark the initial and final conditions of the gas.
In our problem,

,

and

, so the final pressure of the gas can be found by re-arranging eq.(1):

Therefore the correct answer is
<span>1. 0.75 atm</span>
Answer:
1,365 miles
Explanation:
i multiplied 455 x 3 because it traveled 455 miles an hour for three hours.
Answer:
d. None of the above.
Explanation:
In a parabolic motion, you have that in the complete trajectory the component velocity is constant and the vertical component changes in time. Then, the total velocity vector is not zero.
In the complete trajectory the gravitational acceleration is always present. Then, the grasshopper's acceleration vector is not zero.
At the top of the arc the grasshopper is not at equilibrium because the gravitational force is constantly acting on the grasshopper.
Then, the correct answer is:
d. None of the above.
ANOTHER RUNNING DOG
Explanation:
In the given question it is to find a suitable reference point to describe the motion of dog. Here I could suggest that it is better to compare the dog with another running dog to create the relative speed difference to get a reliable motion variation.
Because the motion of dog is in the linear with respect to the another dog and to the acceleration produced by the dog in the required interval is easy to calculate with respect to another dog which is already in motion.
Hence, I suggest that Motion of dog can be analysed better by analyse the motion variation of dog with another dog running.