1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
grin007 [14]
3 years ago
5

Jill said that when you are standing in front of a fire you are warm because you release the coolness of your body to the heat o

f the fire.
Greg said that when you are standing in front of a freezer with the door open you feel cool because you are releasing your heat into the freezer.
Who has made the accurate statement regarding heat transfer
Chemistry
2 answers:
Andrej [43]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: Greg has made the accurate statement

Explanation: Heat transfers from a body with higher temperature to a body with lower temperature, this is a gradient of temperature and is the cause of heat transfer. In fact, cool is just the absents of heat or is just the sensation of a body with low temperature than other.

tatiyna3 years ago
3 0
Greg is accurate. Heat moves from areas of high temperature to low temperature via radiation, conduction and convection.
You might be interested in
Write the half-reactions as they occur at each electrode and the net cell reaction for this electrochemical cell containing tin
mojhsa [17]
  The  half  reactions    as  they  occur   at  each  electrode

is  as  follows

at  the  anode  Sn(s)  =sn^2+(aq)  +  2e  -
at  the  cathode  2  ag^+(aq)   + 2e -  =  2Ag (s)

net  cell  reaction  =   Sn (s)  +  2Ag^+(aq)  =  sn^2+ (aq) +  2  Ag  (s)
8 0
3 years ago
Explain why materials with metallic lattice structures can be used to make wires and connections that conduct electricity in ele
kogti [31]
<span>All metals have similar properties BUT, there can be wide variations in melting point, boiling point, density, electrical conductivity and physical strength.<span>To explain the physical properties of metals like iron or sodium we need a more sophisticated picture than a simple particle model of atoms all lined up in close packed rows and layers, though this picture is correctly described as another example of a giant lattice held together by metallic bonding.</span><span>A giant metallic lattice – the <span>crystal lattice of metals consists of ions (NOT atoms) </span>surrounded by a 'sea of electrons' that form the giant lattice (2D diagram above right).</span><span>The outer electrons (–) from the original metal atoms are free to move around between the positive metal ions formed (+).</span><span>These 'free' or 'delocalised' electrons from the outer shell of the metal atoms are the 'electronic glue' holding the particles together.</span><span>There is a strong electrical force of attraction between these <span>free electrons </span>(mobile electrons or 'sea' of delocalised electrons)<span> (–)</span> and the 'immobile' positive metal ions (+) that form the giant lattice and this is the metallic bond. The attractive force acts in all directions.</span><span>Metallic bonding is not directional like covalent bonding, it is like ionic bonding in the sense that the force of attraction between the positive metal ions and the mobile electrons acts in every direction about the fixed (immobile) metal ions of the metal crystal lattice, but in ionic lattices none of the ions are mobile. a big difference between a metal bond and an ionic bond.</span><span>Metals can become weakened when repeatedly stressed and strained.<span><span>This can lead to faults developing in the metal structure called 'metal fatigue' or 'stress fractures'.</span><span>If the metal fatigue is significant it can lead to the collapse of a metal structure.</span></span></span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
A sample of paraffin wax undergoes the following change: C25H52(s) → C25H52(l)
nalin [4]

Answer:

Explanation:

(a) Answer: Intermolecular forces

The reason for this answer is because the substance (paraffin wax) only changed it's state from solid to liquid and didn't undergo a breakage in it's covalent bond within it's carbon chain which would have produced another substance.

(b) Solid substances are generally more dense than there corresponding liquid substances because the more compact particles are (which occurs in solids), the more dense they become. They are thus more dense than liquids because liquids have there particles loosely packed and well spaced making them less dense than there corresponding solids. Hence, the solid paraffin wax was going to become less dense because it's particles moved from being tightly packed (as solids) to being loosely packed (as liquids). Density refers to mass per volume but can also be described as the level of compactness of a substance. Thus, since liquid is not as compact as solid, it can be said to be less dense than solids.

5 0
3 years ago
Your boss tells you that water at 68 F is flowing in a cooling tower loop at a rate of 600 gpm, in an 8-inch inside diameter pip
avanturin [10]

Explanation:

The volumetric flow rate of water will be as follows.

       q = 600 gpm \times \frac{0.000063 m^{3} s^{-1}}{1 gpm}

         = 0.0378 m^{3}/s&#10;

    Diameter = 8 in \times \frac{0.0254 m}{1 in}

                   = 0.2032 m

Relation between area and diameter is as follows.

           A = \frac{\pi}{4} \times D^{2}

               = \frac{3.14}{4} \times (0.2032 m)^{2}

               = 0.785 x 0.2032 x 0.2032

               = 0.0324 m^{2}

Also,     q = A × V

or,         V = \frac{q}{A}

                = \frac{0.0378 m^{3}/s}{0.0324 m^{2}}

                = 1.166 m/s

As, viscosity of water = 1 cP = 10^{-3} Pa-s

Density of water = 1000 kg/m^{3}

Therefore, we will calculate Reynolds number as follows.

 Reynolds number = \frac{D \times V \times density}{viscosity}

                                 = \frac{0.2032 m \times 1.166 m/s  \times 1000}{10^{-3}}  

                                = 236931.2

Hence, the flow will be turbulent in nature.

Thus, we can conclude that the Reynolds number is 236931.2 and flow is turbulent.

8 0
3 years ago
Why are plastic containers preferred to glass containers for storing chemicals in the laboratory?
Nookie1986 [14]
Plastics are non-corrosive and non-reactive in nature. So they are used for storing chemicals in the laboratory. They are used for strong chemicals because they do not react with chemicals neither do they corrode
7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you have 0.56 moles of an ideal gas at 87 ° C and a pressure of 569 torr, what volume will the gas take up?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the resulting formula unit when magnesium and nitrogen bond
    7·2 answers
  • How many moles are in 1.93x1023 particles of Na3PO4?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the total mass (amu) of carbon in each of the following molecules?
    6·1 answer
  • Which subatomic particles are located in MOST of the space within an atom? A. protons B. neutrons C. electrons
    8·1 answer
  • The concentration of hydroxide ions is greater than the concentration of hydronium ions for acidic solution. True or false.
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why it is necessary for a chemical reaction to balance.
    12·2 answers
  • 1. Calculate the mass (in grams) of 3.8 moles of the following:
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following BEST represents 3.0 moles of an element?
    10·1 answer
  • How many kJ of heat do you need to raise the temperature of 200 g of Aluminum from 80 °C to 100 °C?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!