1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NNADVOKAT [17]
3 years ago
6

A driver is traveling east on a dirt road when she spots a pothole ahead . she slows her car from 14.0 m/s to 5.5 m/s in 6.0 s.

What is the cars acceleration? Please show the formula and how to work it out. Thank you!
Physics
1 answer:
lara31 [8.8K]3 years ago
7 0
The kinematic formula I would use is v(f)=v(i)+at so plugging in the values you'd get 5.5=14+a*6
So a= -1.42, the answer is negative because the car is slowing down.
You might be interested in
Light passes from a material A, which has an index of refraction of 4/3, into material B, which has an index of refraction of 5/
katrin2010 [14]

Answer:

(b) 32.2°

Explanation:

Using Snell's law as:

n_i\times {sin\theta_i}={n_r}\times{sin\theta_r}

Where,  

{\theta_i}  is the angle of incidence  ( 30.0° )

{\theta_r} is the angle of refraction  ( ? )

{n_r} is the refractive index of the refraction medium  (Material B, n=5 / 4)

{n_i} is the refractive index of the incidence medium (Material A, n=4 / 3)

Hence,  

{\frac {4}{3}}\times {sin30.0^0}={\frac {5}{4}}\times{sin\theta_r}

Angle of refraction = sin^{-1}0.5333 = 32.2°

5 0
3 years ago
Blood vessels that carry blood away from the heart are called​
White raven [17]

Answer:

The blood vessels dat carry blood away from the heart are non as arteries, while those dat carry blood back to the heart are veins.

Explanation:

The ARTERIES are major blood vessels connected to your heart.

8 0
3 years ago
1 HELP PLEASE I'LL GIVE BRAINLIST AND POINTS!!!
mixas84 [53]

Explanation:

The question of analog vs. digital audio is one of the more hotly debated questions in the world of music, film and media today. Does digital sound better? Does analog sound better? Is there even a noticeable difference?

It’s impossible to understand the difference completely without understanding what distinguishes analog audio from digital audio. A full discussion of these terms is best left to your curriculum and discussions with your mentor in the studio. For now, though, here’s a brief explanation of what these two words mean, and the differences between them.

Analog refers to a continuously changing representation of a continuously variable quantity. Digital, however, refers to representing these variable quantities in terms of actual numbers, or digits. The last two sentences seem a bit complex, but let’s try to simplify them with an example. If you consider the numbers 1 and 2 on a number line, there are actually an infinite number of points between 1 and 2. This is what analog represents—the infinite number of possibilities between 1 and 2. Digital, on the other hand, only looks at certain number of fixed points along the line between 1 and 2 (for example, 1 ¼, 1 ½, 1 ¾, and 2).

Can you see the difference? Digital takes a few “snapshots” of the number line, while analog takes the whole line into account.

As another example, think of analog vs. digital as the difference between seeing something in real life and watching it on film. When we see something happen in real life, there are no “spaces” between what we see, so we’re watching it happen in analog. Film, however, is actually a series of still photographs that are taken in rapid-fire intervals, and when we see them in succession, it tricks our minds into thinking we’re seeing a continuous flow of movement. So in a manner of speaking, when we watch the event happen on film, we’re watching it digitally, because we’re watching increments of the event, rather than the whole thing in fluid motion. (Not to be confused with digital video vs. film, which is another discussion completely!)

Let’s bring this idea into audio, music, and the studio. Sound occurs naturally in analog–that is to say, sound occurs in a continuous set of waves that we hear with the human ear. (Think of it as a “wavy” line with an infinite number of points along it.) When we capture that sound in a way that represents all the possible frequencies, we’re recording in analog; when we use computers to translate the sound into a series of numbers that approximate what we’re hearing, we’re recording in digital.

Thus, a purely analog recording would be something that was recorded on tape and produced using manual equipment to mix, master and press into a vinyl LP. A purely digital recording would be recorded on a computer program such as Pro Tools, mixed, mastered and produced digitally, and eventually burned onto a CD as an MP3 or audio file.

The most ironic aspect of the debate about digital vs. analog recording is that nowadays a lot of music is a combination of the two.  For example, you might record a song onto analog tape, but mix and master it digitally, or release it on the Internet as an MP3.

So what’s the difference in quality between analog and digital? The idea between digital recording is that our ears and brains technically can’t determine the spaces between the digital values, just like our brains interpret film as continuous motion. However, to many people, analog sound tends to be warmer, has more texture and is thought to capture a truer representation of the actual sound. Digital is felt to be somewhat cold, technical and perhaps lacking in analog’s nuance.

However digital is much cheaper. Recording an album with analog technology can require a whole studio full of equipment, but with digital recording technology, it’s possible to record a whole album in a bedroom on a laptop. And whereas analog technology can wear out or be damaged, digital media can last for an indefinite length of time.

Today many recording artists, both major and independent, record using a mixture of digital and analog techniques. While analog audio does give warmth and a truer sound quality, digital is cheaper to work with and offers more control over the finished product.

4 0
3 years ago
the weight of an object on earth is 350 newtons. on mars the same object would weigh 134 newtons. what is the acceleration due t
Eddi Din [679]
Mass will remain constant on both planet, let mass of the object be "m".
let x be the <span>acceleration due to gravity on the surface of mars.
Weight of object on earth = m *g , where g is </span><span>acceleration due to gravity on the surface of earth
</span>⇒350 =  m *  9.8
⇒m = 350  /  9.8                        .............................equation(1)
Weight of object on mars = m * x , where x is acceleration due to gravity on the surface of mars
134  =   m   *  x                           .............................equation(2)
putting the value of m from equation (1) in equation(2) , we get,
x     =   (134  *  9.8) / 350
⇒  x   =   3.572 m/s²
7 0
4 years ago
gwendolyn has a mass of 17 kg. she is riding her scooter at 1.15 m/s to the right when she runs into maya. maya has a mass of 13
kykrilka [37]
Inelastic collision happens when two objects joined and move together after the collision

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do I find the atom number
    7·1 answer
  • Our solar system was created by the gravitational collapse of the
    6·1 answer
  • What must differ between the atom of two different elements?
    14·1 answer
  • Terrorists carried out their attacks on September 11, 2001, by
    9·1 answer
  • AYUDA SUPER URGENTE CON ESTE EJERCICIO
    11·1 answer
  • A bike and rider together have a mass of 60 kg. If the bike and rider have an acceleration of 2.0 m/s^2, what is the force on th
    10·1 answer
  • You are sitting still at a stoplight. The light turns green and you
    13·1 answer
  • High-altitude mountain climbers do not eat snow, but always melt it first with a stove. To see why, calculate the energy absorbe
    15·1 answer
  • How much gravitational potential energy does an object have if it is located 20 m above the point that we define as O height and
    11·1 answer
  • what is the energy of a photon with a wavelength of 21 nm? hint: treat the planck constant as 7 x 10-34 j*s
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!