Answer:
a) 2.4 mm
b) 1.2 mm
c) 1.2 mm
Explanation:
To find the widths of the maxima you use the diffraction condition for destructive interference, given by the following formula:
a: width of the slit
λ: wavelength
m: order of the minimum
for little angles you have:
y: height of the mth minimum
a) the width of the central maximum is 2*y for m=1:
b) the width of first maximum is y2-y1:
![w=y_2-y_1=\frac{(500*10^{-9}m)(1.2m)}{0.50*10^{-3}m}[2-1]=1.2mm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=w%3Dy_2-y_1%3D%5Cfrac%7B%28500%2A10%5E%7B-9%7Dm%29%281.2m%29%7D%7B0.50%2A10%5E%7B-3%7Dm%7D%5B2-1%5D%3D1.2mm)
c) and for the second maximum:
![w=y_3-y_2=\frac{(500*10^{-9}m)(1.2m)}{0.50*10^{-3}m}[3-2]=1.2mm](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=w%3Dy_3-y_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B%28500%2A10%5E%7B-9%7Dm%29%281.2m%29%7D%7B0.50%2A10%5E%7B-3%7Dm%7D%5B3-2%5D%3D1.2mm)
Momentum = (mass) x (speed)
Momentum = (8 kg) x (5 m/s)
Momentum = 40 kg-m/s
<h3><em>physical</em><em> </em><em>science</em><em> </em><em>deals</em><em> </em><em>with</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>study</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>physics</em><em> </em><em>chemistry</em></h3>
Explanation:
yan lng po Alam ko
Answer: the density changed, the salt dissolved in the water, the salt and the water can still be separated into their individual molecules.
Explanation: physical changes are changes in size, shape, or state. Another way to think about a physical change is any change not involving a change in the substance’s chemical identity. You cannot write a chemical equation for salt water because the chemical identity is still salt AND water
trust me i did it
There is a positive correlation between luminosity and mass of stars, meaning the more luminous a star is, the more massive it is likely to be as well. Given this, the masses of the stars should be in descending order of brightness.
Star 1 is the most luminous, so it should be heaviest, and the luminosity descends to Star 4.
Option B is the only chart that conforms to this, so it is the answer.
Answer is B
