Answer:
The same in both the regions of constructive interference and the regions of destructive interference.
Explanation:
Interference is a phenomenon which occurs when two waves meet while moving along the same medium . The amplitude formed as a result of the interference could be greater, lower, or the same amplitude.
Constructive and destructive interference result from the interaction of waves that are correlated or coherent with each other. This is because arose from the same source or they have the same or nearly the same frequency.
The waves being coherent, arising from the same source and having the same frequency explains why it’s the same in both the regions of constructive interference and the regions of destructive interference.
Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx
Answer:
λ = 5.2 x 10⁻⁷ m = 520 nm
Explanation:
From Young's Double Slit Experiment, we know the following formula for the distance between consecutive bright fringes:
Δx = λL/d
where,
Δx = fringe spacing = distance of 1st bright fringe from center = 0.00322 m
L = Distance between slits and screen = 3.1 m
d = Separation between slits = 0.0005 m
λ = wavelength of light = ?
Therefore,
0.00322 m = λ(3.1 m)/(0.0005 m)
λ = (0.00322 m)(0.0005 m)/(3.1 m)
<u>λ = 5.2 x 10⁻⁷ m = 520 nm</u>
The ozone layer that is inside the stratosphere blocks UV radiation.
The ozone layer contains high concentrations of ozone relative to other parts of the atmosphere. This was discovered by Charles Fabry and Henri Buisson who are both French Physicists.
The ozone in the earth's stratosphere is created through ultraviolet light striking a group of ordinary oxygen molecules containing two oxygen atoms, subsequently splitting them into individual oxygen atoms and finally these said atomic oxygen then combines with unbroken O2 to create ozone (O3).
Answer:
16.2 days
Explanation:
Find the number of halflives:
1/2 * 1/2 = 1/4 so <u>two</u> halflives have passed
2 * 8.1 days = 16.2 days
