Answer:
(a) 62.69 nJ/m^3
(b) 1015.22 μJ/m^3
Explanation:
Electric field, E = 119 V/m
Magnetic field, B = 5.050 x 10^-5 T
(a) Energy density of electric field = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9edcf/9edcf9838ea4041b17c55b31b64459a5ef30bb51" alt="\frac{1}{2}\varepsilon _{0}E^{2}"
= 6.269 x 10^-8 J/m^3 = 62.69 nJ/m^3
(b) energy density of magnetic field = data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cce8/3cce8b3a88bca5e35eb752475fbea536348fb8fe" alt="\frac{B^{2}}{2\mu _{0}}"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6691/d66916e89edc37d4c6030d9da81f3d3bb9b44c2d" alt="=\frac{\left ( 5.05\times 10^{-5} \right )^{2}}{2\times 4\times 3.14\times 10^{-7}}"
= 1.01522 x 10^-3 J/m^3 = 1015.22 μJ/m^3
If you are given distance and a period of time, you can calculate
the speed. The velocity of an object is the rate of change of its position with
respect to a frame of reference, and is a function of time. Velocity is
equivalent to a specification of its speed and direction of motion (e.g. 60
km/h to the north).
I don't think so as long as you make it apparent that the information comes the same source. So citing over and over again is unnecessary as long as it's clear that the information is from the same website or source. If you can't make it clear that they are from the same website source, it would a safe choice to continue to cite to avoid allegations of plagiarism.
Answer:
The hypothesis may or may not be true and needs to be tested. It might be the answer to the problem. Hence, it must be tested thoroughly. When these predictions are tested again and again in independent scientific experiments and gets verified, the hypothesis is converted into a scientific theory.
Present. NOT SURE IF THIS IS EVEN RIGHT!! I JUST GUESSED AND THOUGHT