Answer:
The answer is: <u>Al2O3</u>
Explanation:
The data they give us is:
To find the empirical formula without knowing the grams of the compound, we find it per mole:
- 0.545 g Al * 1 mol Al / 27 g Al = 0.02 mol Al
- 0.485 g O * 1 mol O / 16 g O = 0.03 mol O
Then we must divide the results obtained by the lowest result, which in this case is 0.02:
- 0.02 mol Al / 0.02 = 1 Al
- 0.03 mol O / 0.02 = 1.5 O
Since both numbers have to give an integer, multiply by 2 until both remain integers:
Now the answer is given correctly:
Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
<span>0.38
You first calculate the total moles by dividing the grams by molecular weight:
45 g N2 / 28.02 g/mol = 1.6 mol N2
40 g Ar / 39.95 g/mol = 1.0 mol
Then you divide the moles of Ar by the total number of moles:
1.0 / (1.6 + 1.0) = 0.38 mol fraction</span>
