What term describes isotopes with an unbalanced number of neutrons?

How many moles of a gas would occupy 11.4 L at 273K and 2.00 atm?

bagirrra123 [75]

Answer:

1.02mol

Explanation:

Using the general gas equation below;

PV = nRT

Where;

P = pressure (atm)

V = volume (L)

n = number of moles (mol)

R = gas law constant (0.0821 Latm/molK)

T = temperature (K)

According to the information provided in this question,

P = 2.0 atm

V = 11.4L

T = 273K

n = ?

Using PV = nRT

n = PV/RT

n = 2 × 11.4/ 0.0821 × 273

n = 22.8/22.41

n = 1.017

n = 1.02mol

3 0

2 years ago

In acidic solution, the breakdown of sucrose into glucose and fructose has this rate law: rate = k[H+][sucrose].

Karo-lina-s [1.5K]

Answer:

a)If concentration of [Sucrose] is changed to 2.5 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 2.5.

b)If concentration of [Sucrose] is changed to 0.5 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 0.5.

c)If concentration of $[H^+]$ is changed to 0.0001 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 0.01.

d) If concentration when [sucrose] and $[H^+]$ both are changed to 0.1 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 1.

Explanation:

Sucrose + $H^+\rightarrow$ fructose+ glucose

The rate law of the reaction is given as:

$R=k[H^+][sucrose]$

$[H^+]=0.01M$

[sucrose]= 1.0 M

$R=k[0.01M][1.0 M]$ ..[1]

a)

The rate of the reaction when [Sucrose] is changed to 2.5 M = R'

$R'=[0.01 M][2.5 M]$ ..[2]

[2] ÷ [1]

$\frac{R'}{R}=\frac{[0.01 M][2.5 M]}{k[0.01M][1.0 M]}$

$R'=2.5\times R$

If concentration of [Sucrose] is changed to 2.5 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 2.5.

b)

The rate of the reaction when [Sucrose] is changed to 0.5 M = R'

$R'=[0.01 M][0.5 M]$ ..[2]

[2] ÷ [1]

$\frac{R'}{R}=\frac{[0.01 M][0.5 M]}{k[0.01M][1.0 M]}$

$R'=2.5\times R$

If concentration of [Sucrose] is changed to 0.5 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 0.5.

c)

The rate of the reaction when $[H^+]$ is changed to 0.001 M = R'

$R'=[0.0001 M][1.0 M]$ ..[2]

[2] ÷ [1]

$\frac{R'}{R}=\frac{[0.0001 M][1.0M]}{k[0.01M][1.0 M]}$

$R'=0.01\times R$

If concentration of $[H^+]$ is changed to 0.0001 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 0.01.

d)

The rate of the reaction when [sucrose] and $[H^+]$ both are changed to 0.1 M = R'

$R'=[0.1M][0.1M]$ ..[2]

[2] ÷ [1]

$\frac{R'}{R}=\frac{[0.1M][0.1M]}{k[0.01M][1.0 M]}$

$R'=1\times R$

If concentration when [sucrose] and $[H^+]$ both are changed to 0.1 M than rate will be increased by the factor of 1.

5 0

3 years ago

Which of the following is the reason that the lemurs shown below share many traits?

ycow [4]

A. They have similar DNA

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

You need to produce a buffer solution that has a pH of 5.50. You already have a solution that contains 10 mmol (millimoles) of a

balandron [24]

Answer:

56.9 mmoles of acetate are required in this buffer

Explanation:

To solve this, we can think in the Henderson Hasselbach equation:

pH = pKa + log ([CH₃COO⁻] / [CH₃COOH])

To make the buffer we know:

CH₃COOH + H₂O ⇄ CH₃COO⁻ + H₃O⁺ Ka

We know that Ka from acetic acid is: 1.8×10⁻⁵

pKa = - log Ka

pKa = 4.74

We replace data:

5.5 = 4.74 + log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)

5.5 - 4.74 = log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)

0.755 = log ([acetate] / 10 mmol)

10⁰'⁷⁵⁵ = ([acetate] / 10 mmol)

5.69 = ([acetate] / 10 mmol)

5.69 . 10 = [acetate] → 56.9 mmoles

6 0

2 years ago

When the paramagnetic [co(cn)6] 4– ion is oxidized to [co(cn)6] 3– , the ion becomes diamagnetic. however, when the paramagnetic

S_A_V [24]

Answer:
Basically, paramagnetic and diamagnetic refer to the way a chemical species interacts with a magnetic field. More specifically, it refers to whether or not a chemical species has any unpaired electrons or not.
A diamagnetic species has no unpaired electrons, while a paramagnetic species has one or more unpaired electrons.
Now, I won't go into too much detail about crystal field theory in general, since I assume that you're familiar with it.
So, you're dealing with the hexafluorocobaltate(III) ion, [CoF6]3â’, and the hexacyanocobaltate(III) ion, [Co(CN)6]3â’.
You know that [CoF6]3â’ is paramagnetic and that [Co(CN)6]3â’ is diamagnetic, which means that you're going to have to determine why the former ion has unpaired electrons and the latter does not.
Both complex ions contain the cobalt(III) cation, Co3+, which has the following electron configuration
Co3+:1s22s22p63s23p63d6
For an isolated cobalt(III) cation, all these five 3d-orbitals are degenerate. The thing to remember now is that the position of the ligand on the spectrochemical series will determine how these d-orbtals will split.
More specifically, you can say that
a strong field ligand will produce a more significant splitting energy, Î” a weak field ligand will produce a less significant splitting energy, Î”
Now, the spectrochemical series looks like this
http://chemedu.pu.edu.tw/genchem/delement/9.htmhttp://chemedu.pu.edu.tw/genchem/delement/9.htm
Notice that the cyanide ion, CNâ’, is higher on the spectrochemical series than the fluoride ion, Fâ’. This means that the cyanide ion ligands will cause a more significant energy gap between the eg and t2g orbitals when compared with the fluoride ion ligands.
http://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media/objects/3313/3393071/blb2405.htmlhttp://wps.prenhall.com/wps/media...
In the case of the hexafluorocobaltate(III) ion, the splitting energy is smaller than the electron pairing energy, and so it is energetically favorable to promote two electrons from the t2g orbitals to the eg orbitals â†’ a high spin complex will be formed.
This will ensure that the hexafluorocobaltate(III) ion will have unpaired electrons, and thus be paramagnetic.
On the other hand, in the case of the hexacyanocobaltate(III) ion, the splitting energy is higher than the electron pairing energy, and so it is energetically favorable to pair up those four electrons in the t2g orbitals â†’ a low spin complex is formed.
Since it has no unpaired electrons, the hexacyanocobaltate(III) ion will be diamagnetic.

6 0

3 years ago