1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lilavasa [31]
4 years ago
9

Bobby found that water has a high boiling point and concluded this was because water intermolecular forces. Based on the data, i

s Bobby's conclusion correct
Chemistry
1 answer:
Art [367]4 years ago
5 0

Yes, Bobby is correct

Explanation:

Anomalously high boiling point of water is as a result of the intermolecular forces between the molecules of water.

The intermolecular forces found in water are the very strong hydrogen bonds.  The bulk of the physical properties of matter are due to the intermolecular forces that they possess.

  • Hydrogen bonds are stronger than van der waals forces and they are more effective in binding molecules together into larger units.
  • Substances whose molecules join via hydrogen bonds have higher boiling points i.e lower volatility than those with van der waals forces.
  • Hydrogen bond is actually an electrostatic attraction between hydrogen atom of none molecule and the electronegative atom(O or N or F) of a neighboring molecule.

Learn more:

Hydrogen bonds brainly.com/question/10602513

#learnwithBrainly

You might be interested in
Is the bond C=O polar or non polar
rewona [7]

Answer:

Non Polar

Explanation:

Non Polar molecule because of its linear symmetric shape

6 0
3 years ago
After he conducted cathode ray tube experiments proving the existence of negatively charged particles we now call electrons, Tho
Lina20 [59]

Answer:

Answer is explained below;

Explanation:

In 1904, after the discovery of the electron, the English physicist Sir J.J. Thomson proposed the plum pudding model of an atom. In this model, the atom had a positively-charged space with negatively charged electrons embedded inside it i.e., like a pudding (positively charged space) with plums (electrons) inside.

In 1911, another physicist Ernest Rutherford proposed another model known as the Rutherford model or planetary model of the atom that describes the structure of atoms. In this model, the small and dense atom has a positively charged core called the nucleus. Also, he proposed that just like the planets revolving around the Sun, the negatively charged electrons are moving around the nucleus.

By conducting a gold foil experiment, Rutherford disproved Thomson's model. In this experiment, positively charged alpha particles emitted from a radioactive source enclosed within a protective lead were used which was then focused into a narrow beam. It was then passed through a slit in front of which a thin section of gold foil was placed. A fluorescent screen (coated with zinc sulfide) was also placed in front of the slit to detect alpha particles which on striking the fluorescent screen would produce scintillation (a burst of light) which was visible through a microscope attached to the back of the screen.

He observed that most of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil without any resistance and this implied that atoms contain a large amount of open space. The slight deflection of some of the alpha particles, the large-angle scattering of other alpha particles and even the bouncing back of a very few alpha particles toward the source suggested their interactions with other positively charged particles inside the atom.

So, he concluded that only a dense and positively charged particle such as the nucleus would be responsible for such strong repulsion. Also, the negatively charged electrons electrically balanced the positive nuclear charge and they moved around the nucleus in circular orbits. Between the electrons and nucleus, there was an electrostatic force of attraction just like the gravitational force of attraction between the sun and the revolving planets.

Later, the Rutherford model was replaced by the Bohr atomic model.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not equal to 0.536 kilometers?
ladessa [460]
53.6 hectometers is not equal to 0.536 kilometer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When 3.0 kg of water is warmed from 10 °C to 80 °C, how much heat energy is needed?
Naddik [55]

Answer:

THE HEAT NEEDED TO CHANGE 3KG OF WATER FROM 10 C TO 80 C IS 877.8kJ OR 877,800 J.

Explanation:

Mass = 3.0 kg = 3 * 1000 = 3000 g

Initial temperature = 10 C

Final temperature = 80 C

Change in temperature = 80 - 10 = 70 C

Specific heat of water = 4.18 J/g C

Heat needed = unknown

Heat is the amount of energy in joules needed to change a gram of water by 1 C.

Heat = mass * specific heat * change in temperature

Heat = 3000 g * 4.18 J/g C * 70 C

Heat = 877 800 Joules

Heat = 877.8 kJ.

The heat needed to change 3 kg mass of water from 10 C to 80 C is 877,800 J or 877.8 kJ.

6 0
3 years ago
How many mole ratios can be written for a chemical reaction involving 3 substances
Anika [276]
There can be three mole ratios that can be written involving three substances.It depends on the constant of your reactant to your product. It also depends on the asked mole ratio. But the maximum would be 3 mole ratios because you have 3 substances in your reaction.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Complete the sentences to explain your reasoning.
    6·1 answer
  • Consider the reaction corresponding to a voltaic cell and its standard cell potential.
    7·1 answer
  • If an isotope has an atomic number of 8 and a mass number of 18 how many neutrons
    8·1 answer
  • Consider the following equilibrium:H2CO3(aq) + H2O(l) H3O+(aq) + HCO3-1(aq).What is the correct equilibrium expression?
    15·1 answer
  • How many moles of aluminum do 4.60×10^24 aluminum atoms represent?
    7·1 answer
  • The pH of a substance can only be determined when it is
    7·2 answers
  • In a chemical reaction, which is the MOST LIKELY reactant for these products?
    5·2 answers
  • What is the mass in grams of 1.00 x 10 24 atoms of Mn?
    13·2 answers
  • Show the complete ionic equation and net ionic equation for all the equations below, then state whether or not a precipitate (in
    7·1 answer
  • Please only answer if you are 100% sure it's a major grade.<br> .<br> 35 POINTS
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!