All categories

3 years ago

The thermal energy in a hot iron flows into a shirt. what can possibly be said about this situation

2 answers:

7 0

The correct answer for this question would be option A. When the thermal energy in a hot iron flows into a shirt, what we can possibly say about this situation is that, the iron is warmer than the shirt. The transfer of heat from the iron to the shirt is called heat conduction. Hope this answer helps.

bogdanovich [222]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

a) The hot iron is warmer than the shirt.

Explanation:

Thermal energy always flows from a hot object to a cold object.

This process is similar to water flowing from a higher level to a lower level.

In the given question, since the iron is hot, it has greater thermal energy compared to the shirt. So heat flow is from the hot iron to the shirt.

( like during the ironing of a shirt).

You might be interested in

A stone is dropped into a river from a bridge 41.7 m above the water. Another stone is thrown vertically down 1.80 s after the f

hram777 [196]

Answer:

31.75 m/s

Explanation:

h = 41.7 m

Let the initial velocity of the second stone is u

Let the time taken to reach to the bottom by the first stone is t then the time taken by the second stone to reach the ground is t - 1.8.

For first stone:

Use second equation of motion

$h=ut+\frac{1}{2}gt^2$

Here, u = 0, g = 9.8 m/s^2 and t be the time and h = 41.7

So, 41.7= 0 + 0.5 x 9.8 x t^2

41.7 = 4.9 t^2

t = 2.92 s ..... (1)

For second stone:

Use second equation of motion

$h=ut+\frac{1}{2}gt^2$

Here, g = 9.8 m/s^2 and time taken is t - 1.8 = 2.92 - 1.8 = 1.12 s, h = 41.7 m and u be the initial velocity

$h=u\left ( t-1.8 \right )+4.9\left ( t-1.8 \right )^2$ .... (2)

By equation the equation (1) and (2), we get

$41.7=1.12 u +4.9 \times 1.12^{2}$

u = 31.75 m/s

5 0

3 years ago

What graph shape is this what does the snap tell you

vekshin1

The picture is hard to see but if you still need help message me

7 0

3 years ago

Sound travels through air at 343 m/s,

sasho [114]

The sound wave will have traveled 2565 m farther in water than in air.

Answer:

Explanation:

It is known that distance covered by any object is directly proportional to the velocity of the object and the time taken to cover that distance.

Distance = Velocity × Time.

So if time is kept constant, then the distance covered by a wave can vary depending on the velocity of the wave.

As we can see in the present case, the velocity of sound wave in air is 343 m/s. So in 2.25 s, the sound wave will be able to cover the distance as shown below.

Distance = 343 × 2.25 =771.75 m

And for the sound wave travelling in fresh water, the velocity is given as 1483 m/s. So in a time interval of 2.25 s, the distance can be determined as the product of velocity and time.

Distance = 1483×2.25=3337 m.

Since, the velocity of sound wave travelling in fresh water is greater than the sound wave travelling in air, the distance traveled by sound wave in fresh water will be greater.

Difference in distance covered in water and air = 3337-772 m = 2565 m

So the sound wave will have traveled 2565 m farther in water than in air.

5 0

3 years ago

A kid on a trampoline has 1,000 J of potential energy when they are at the top of a jump. How much kinetic energy will the kid h

emmasim [6.3K]

C: 500 J
Hope this helped!

7 0

2 years ago

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between frequency and wavelength?

Reika [66]

Answer:

Answer:

Option B

Explanation:

Option B talks about how the frequency of the wave increases the shorter it's wavelengths

4 0

2 years ago