This requires familiarity with the different theories (or concepts) of acids and bases.
On the Arrhenius concept, an acid is a substance that produces an H⁺ ion in water such that the H⁺ concentration increases, and a base is a substance that produces an OH⁻ ion in water such that the OH⁻ concentration increases.
On the Brønsted–Lowry concept, an acid is a substance that donates a proton (which is basically an H⁺ ion) in a solvent, and a base is a substance that accepts a proton in a solvent.
On the Lewis concept, an acid is a substance that accepts an electron pair in a solvent, and a base is a substance that donates an electron pair in a solvent.
The concepts become progressively broader, i.e., the Arrhenius concept is the most restrictive and the Lewis concept is the least restrictive. As a corollary, an Arrhenius acid or base is also both a Brønsted–Lowry acid or base and a Lewis acid or base, respectively; a Brønsted–Lowry acid or base is not necessarily an Arrhenius acid or base, but an Arrhenius acid or base is also a Lewis acid or base, respectively. And finally, a Lewis acid or base may not necessarily be either an Arrhenius or a Brønsted–Lowry acid or base.
So, with the above concepts in mind, we can match the statements in column A with the type of acid or base in column B:
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
The electoral college ensures that the most populated states can't always pick the next president. States that have the most population would be able to skew the elections by cancelling out several other less populated state's voters. One large city could cancel out every vote from the state of Rhode Island.
With the electoral college, each state has a given number of votes to cast for a president. Some states can split their college votes while others cast all votes for the same candidate.
If you look at Pennsylvania in 2020 as an example, they have 20 electoral votes. Pennsylvania does not split their votes so all go to just one candidate. In the measurement of votes, it might show that candidate A got 51% of the votes and candidate B got 49%. The 20 electoral votes would all go to candidate A and candidate B gets nothing. Candidate B may have gotten millions of individual votes within the state but that no longer matters. Candidate A won the state so gets all 20 electoral votes. If the country went by the individual vote, Candidate B would keep all those votes he got from the 2 or 3 large cities in Pennsylvania.
It would be easy to see that if you only counted the individual votes (called the popular vote), a candidate could compile more votes from all of the states even though the candidate did not win that state by the majority vote. The electoral college makes sure that a candidate cannot carry those votes from the state that they lost.
If elections were based on this popular vote, then most of the states with small populations would barely affect the outcome of an election. The popularity vote would ensure that the states with the largest populated cities would always control who gets elected.
It would especially be detrimental in todays age since most large cities are almost always voting for just one party.
Answer:
The student measured the cup and got an incorrect answer
Explanation:
because he was in a rush.
Answer:
ive learned about the chart , ive learned about the coolest chemicle reactions and how. the can change colors , ive also learned that chenistrey is all around us since the beginning of life ,and how liquid can turn solid
Explanation:
