You haven't told us anything about the detectors being used. We don't know how the sensitivity of the detector is related to the total number of photons absorbed, and we don't even know whether you and your friend are both using the same type of detector.
All we can do, in desperation, is ASSUME that the minimum time required to just detect a star is inversely proportional to the total number of its photons that strike the detector. That is, assume . . .
(double the number of photons) ===> (detect the source in half the time) .
-- The intensity of light delivered to the prime focus of a telescope is directly proportional to the AREA of its objective lens or mirror, which in turn is proportional to the square of its radius or diameter.
So your telescope gathers (0.18/0.05)² = 12.96 times as much light as your friends telescope does.
-- So we'd expect your instrument to detect the same star in
(119.5 min) / (12.96) = <em>9.22 minutes .</em>
We're simply comparing the performance of two different telescopes as they observe the same object, so the star's magnitude doesn't matter.
The greatest difference between high and low tide is around New Moon and Full Moon. During these Moon phases, the solar tide coincides with the lunar tide because the Sun and the Moon are aligned with Earth, and their gravitational forces combine to pull the ocean's water in the same direction.
Your answer is B Full moon
I don't get what you're trying to say, I only see A. and B. so I will say the answer is possibly A.
Answer:
fossil fuels are being used more because fossil fuels are of great importance because they can burn to produce a significant amount of energy per unit mass the use of coal as a fuel prefates recorded history.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :)
