3 years ago

Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results?

1 answer:

7 0

When publishing experimental results, it is always advisable to have your peer review those results. This peer can confirm the results that you got and thus they will be more reliable.

Also, you will be sure that what what you are publishing is correctly presented as it is always good to have a fresh eya to double-check what is written.

You might be interested in

Which subatomic part of the atom (a-c) are involved in chemical bonds and reactions?

Marianna [84]

B because it can stabilize

8 0

3 years ago

A method of problem solving that uses the units that are part of a measurement to solve a problem

zzz [600]

I believe dimensional analysis

4 0

2 years ago

NEED HELP ASAP PLEASE

frutty [35]

C. NO2 is covalent. Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is NOT a testable hypothesis?

Leto [7]

Gravity is caused by a magical force

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Most acids form ions in solution by ionizing, and most bases form ions in solution by

Fiesta28 [93]

There are other ions that make acidic and basic solutions, but we won't be talking about them here. That pH scale we talked about is actually a measure of the number of H + ions in a solution. If there are a lot of H + ions, the pH is very low.

Hope I helped :)

8 0

2 years ago