Why is peer review important when publishing experimental results?

1 answer:

7 0

When publishing experimental results, it is always advisable to have your peer review those results. This peer can confirm the results that you got and thus they will be more reliable.

Also, you will be sure that what what you are publishing is correctly presented as it is always good to have a fresh eya to double-check what is written.

You might be interested in

Which is the best description of the chemical reaction shown here in aqueous solution? ch3ch2cooh (aq) ↔ ch3ch2coo- (aq) + h+ (a

AnnZ [28]

The given reaction:
<span>ch3ch2cooh (aq) ↔ ch3ch2coo- (aq) + h+ (aq)
is called a reversible reaction.

This means that, the reaction does not reach an end point.
In this type of reactions, reactants react together to form products, while products combine together to form reactants.
So, the reaction proceeds in both direction forming both reactants and products.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

When CO2 decomposes into oxygen and carbon, it gives a gram ratio of 2.67:1 O2:C. When a 32.4g of CO2 decomposes, how many grams

Rufina [12.5K]

Answer : The mass of carbon and oxygen produced is 8.83 g and 23.6 g respectively.

Explanation :

Law of conservation of mass : It states that mass can neither be created nor be destroyed but it can only be transformed from one form to another form.

This also means that total mass on the reactant side must be equal to the total mass on the product side.

The balanced chemical reaction will be,

$CO_2\rightarrow O_2+C$