Answer:
1 angstrom = 0.1nm
5000 angstrom = 5000/1 × 0.1nm
<h3>= 500nm</h3>
5000 angstrom = 5000 × 1 × 10^-10
<h3>= 5 × 10^-7 m</h3>
Hope this helps you
Potential energy is energy stored in an object. kinetic energy is energy of motion
Answer:
magnitude of net magnetic field at given point is
Explanation:
As we know that magnetic field due to a long current carrying wire is given as
here we we will find the magnetic field due to wire which is along x axis is given as
r = 2 m
now we have
into the plane
Now similarly magnetic field due to another wire which is perpendicular to xy plane is given as
r = 2 m
now we have
along + x direction
Since the two magnetic field is perpendicular to each other
So here net magnetic field is given as
Newton’s second law of motion states that when a force acts on an object, the object’s acceleration is equal to the net force divided by the object’s mass, and is in the same direction as the net force.
Explanation:
They probably put "rolls without slipping" in there to indicate that there is no loss in friction; or that the friction is constant throughout the movement of the disk. So it's more of a contingency part of the explanation of the problem.
(Remember how earlier on in Physics lessons, we see "ignore friction" written into problems; it just removes the "What about [ ]?" question for anyone who might ask.)
In this case, you can't ignore friction because the disk wouldn't roll without it.
As far as friction producing a torque... I would say that friction is a result of the torque in this case. And because the point of contact is, presumably, the ground, the friction is tangential to the disk. Meaning the friction is linear and has no angular component.
(You could probably argue that by Newton's 3rd Law there should be some opposing torque, but I think that's outside of the scope of this problem.)
Hopefully this helps clear up the misunderstanding for you.
