Answer:
b is ur answer the temputer does increase
Explanation:
Answer:
the first energy level is closest to nuclear the second energy level is a little farther away than the first
Answer:
The chemical potential of 2-propanol in solution relative to that of pure 2-propanol is lower by 2.63x10⁻³.
Explanation:
The chemical potential of 2-propanol in solution relative to that of pure 2-propanol can be calculated using the following equation:
<u>Where:</u>
<em>μ (l): is the chemical potential of 2-propanol in solution </em>
<em>μ° (l): is the chemical potential of pure 2-propanol </em>
<em>R: is the gas constant = 8.314 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ </em>
<em>T: is the temperature = 82.3 °C = 355.3 K </em>
<em>x: is the mole fraction of 2-propanol = 0.41 </em>

Therefore, the chemical potential of 2-propanol in solution relative to that of pure 2-propanol is lower by 2.63x10⁻³.
I hope it helps you!
10 elements compose the bulk of rock forming minerals
Answer:
The particles that compose a gas are so small compared to the distances between them that the volume of the individual particles can be assumed to be negligible.
Explanation:
This is a postulate of the Kinetic Molecular Theory.
A is wrong. KMT assumes the that the volume of the particles is negligible.
B is wrong. KMT assumes that the distance between the particles is muck greater than their size.
D is wrong. It takes the large distances as a fact. KMT uses this as an assumption.