In order to deprotonate an acid, we must remove protons in order to achieve a more stable conjugate base. For this example, we can use the relationship between carboxylic acid and hydroxide.
Deprotonation is the removal of a proton from a specific type of acid in reaction to its coming into contact with a strong base. The compound formed from this reaction is known as the conjugate base of that acid. The opposite process is also possible and is when a proton is added to a special kind of base. This is a process referred to as protonation, which forms the conjugate acid of that base.
For the example we have chosen to give, the conjugate base is the carboxylate salt. This would be the compound formed by the deprotonated carboxylic acid. The base in question was strong enough to deprotonate the acid due to the greater stability offered as a conjugated base.
To learn more visit:
brainly.com/question/5613072?referrer=searchResults
In general, The more valence electrons a metal has, the stronger its metallic bonds will be because Boron is a metalloid and is ionically bonded.it is too electronegative to release its valence electrons for metallic bonding.As a result, their valence electrons feel a stronger pull from the nucleus (a greater effective nuclear charge) and are less easily released for metallic bonding.
Answer:
The standard enthalpy change for the reaction at 
is -2043.999kJ
Explanation:
Standard enthalpy change (
) for the given reaction is expressed as:
![\Delta H_{rxn}^{0}=[3mol\times \Delta H_{f}^{0}(CO_{2})_{g}]+[4mol\times \Delta H_{f}^{0}(H_{2}O)_{g}]-[1mol\times \Delta H_{f}^{0}(C_{3}H_{8})_{g}]-[5mol\times \Delta H_{f}^{0}(O_{2})_{g}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CDelta%20H_%7Brxn%7D%5E%7B0%7D%3D%5B3mol%5Ctimes%20%5CDelta%20H_%7Bf%7D%5E%7B0%7D%28CO_%7B2%7D%29_%7Bg%7D%5D%2B%5B4mol%5Ctimes%20%5CDelta%20H_%7Bf%7D%5E%7B0%7D%28H_%7B2%7DO%29_%7Bg%7D%5D-%5B1mol%5Ctimes%20%5CDelta%20H_%7Bf%7D%5E%7B0%7D%28C_%7B3%7DH_%7B8%7D%29_%7Bg%7D%5D-%5B5mol%5Ctimes%20%5CDelta%20H_%7Bf%7D%5E%7B0%7D%28O_%7B2%7D%29_%7Bg%7D%5D)
Where 
refers standard enthalpy of formation
Plug in all the given values from literature in the above equation:
![\Delta H_{rxn}^{0}=[3mol\times (-393.509kJ/mol)]+[4mol\times (-241.818kJ/mol)]-[1mol\times (-103.8kJ/mol)]-[5mol\times (0kJ/mol)]=-2043.999kJ](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CDelta%20H_%7Brxn%7D%5E%7B0%7D%3D%5B3mol%5Ctimes%20%28-393.509kJ%2Fmol%29%5D%2B%5B4mol%5Ctimes%20%28-241.818kJ%2Fmol%29%5D-%5B1mol%5Ctimes%20%28-103.8kJ%2Fmol%29%5D-%5B5mol%5Ctimes%20%280kJ%2Fmol%29%5D%3D-2043.999kJ)
Answer:
okay lol, ima use this for points if okay
Explanation:
Any substance made out of iotas, that has mass and possesses space. Matter ought not be mistaken for mass, as the two are not the same in current material science. Matter is itself a physical substance of which frameworks might be formed, while mass isn't a substance but instead a quantitative property of issue and different substances or frameworks. While there are diverse perspectives on what ought to be viewed as issue, the mass of a substance or framework is the same regardless of any such meaning of issue. Another distinction is that issue has an "inverse" called antimatter, however mass has no inverse—there is no such thing as "hostile to mass" or negative mass. Antimatter has the same (i.e. positive) mass property as its typical issue partner.
