Answer:
(2x + 4)(x - 4)=2x^2-4x-16
The force required to pull one of the microscope sliding at a constant speed of 0.28 m/s relative to the other is zero.
<h3>
Force required to pull one end at a constant speed</h3>
The force required to pull one of the microscope sliding at a constant speed of 0.28 m/s relative to the other is determined by applying Newton's second law of motion as shown below;
F = ma
where;
- m is mass
- a is acceleration
At a constant speed, the acceleration of the object will be zero.
F = m x 0
F = 0
Thus, the force required to pull one of the microscope sliding at a constant speed of 0.28 m/s relative to the other is zero.
Learn more about constant speed here: brainly.com/question/2681210
The energy conservation and trigonometry we can find the results for the questions about the movement of the acrobat are;
a) The maximum speed is v = 4.89 m / s
b) The maximum height is h = 1.22 m
The energy conservation is one of the most fundamental principles of physics, stable that if there are no friction forces the mechanistic energy remains constant. Mechanical energy is the sum of the kinetic energy plus the potential energies.
Em = K + U
Let's write the energy in two points.
Starting point. Highest part of the oscillation
Em₀ = U = m g h
Final point. Lower part of the movement
= K = ½ m v²
Energy is conserved.
Emo =
m g h = ½ m v²
v² = 2 gh
Let's use trigonometry to find the height, see attached.
h = L - L cos θ
h = L (1- cos θ)
They indicate that the initial angle is tea = 48º and the length is L = 3.7 m, let's calculate.
h = 3.7 (1- cos 48)
h = 1.22 m
this is the maximum height of the movement.
Let's calculate the velocity.
v = 4.89 m / s
In conclusion using the conservation of energy and trigonometry we can find the results for the questions about the movement of the acrobat are;
a) The maximum speed is v = 4.89 m / s
b) The maximum height is h = 1.22 m
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/13010190
Answer:
I do not think that it is the most reliable way to gain information since it is very hard to do and can be easily messed up. No, I don't think you can charge someone on only evidence from blood spatter, but if there was additional evidence I think that this would definitely help with the case but not on its own, since it doesn’t give you physical evidence about the suspect.
Explanation:
Answer:
5070
Explanation:
add them up and then you get <em>your</em><em> </em><em>answers</em><em> </em>