The cost of developing thermonuclear power with plasmabe defended because D. It can provide an inexpensive power source.
<h3>How did the
cost of developing t
hermonuclear power defended?</h3>
The cost of developing thermonuclear power defended becvause we can see in the paragraph how it was told that the generation of ths power can be donee through the understanding of the occurrence of plasmain nature,
It should be noted that this thermonuclear power with plasmabe posses the characteristics which make it to exist in the ionosphere, and it can be felt in the flames as well; as in the chemical and nuclearexplosions.
In conclusion the power can be seen as an inexpensive source power because the p[roduction of this power cn be found in most of the thing that can be found around us as discused above.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Read more about cost at:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ1
Answer:
Explanation:
If you look closely, force 1 does not reach 0.2 until 0.4 force 2 reaches 0.2 at about 0.2 - hope that made sense :P
Answer:
180 m
Explanation:
The rock follows a free-fall motion - so the vertical distance covered can be found by using the equation

where
g = 10 m/s^2 is the acceleration due to gravity
t = 6.00 s is the time of the fall
Substituting these data, we find the height of the cliff:

To find wave speed, you multiply the wavelength by the frequency. This means it is 8 times 11. This gives you 88. That means the answer is 88mm/s