Empirical evidence is information acquired by observation or experimentation. This data is recorded and analyzed by scientists and is a central process as part of the scientific method. As example of not empirical evidence: Language, letters, words, truths, numbers, logic, mathematics, on and on. All of these things do not have empirical existence. They exist only in the mind.
Since we're discussing shots, the significant thing is the way the energy is changed over as there is deceleration of the bullet to a halt when it hits something.
Kinetic Energy is relative to mass times speed squared, so in reality, the 2 cases given have practically indistinguishable Kinetic energy. The measure of energy is authoritative, so the two cases will do generally a similar harm given, obviously we look at situations when all the kinetic energy is spent.
One contrast that will be effectively obvious is that the weapon in the case of heavy bullet will recoil more.
One can consider energy assimilation as force times separation distance, and energy ingestion as a product of force and time.
Henceforth, the heavier yet more slow bullet with a similar energy will venture to every part of a similar separation in the engrossing material, but since of bigger force, will take a more drawn out time doing it.
It will along these lines, additionally, give a more noteworthy "kick" to the object that absorbs.
