All categories

3 years ago

What would lack of calcium do to bones

Physics

2 answers:

Sonja [21]3 years ago

5 0

They compromise the density of the bones causing them to be brittle and easy to break hope it helps

timurjin [86]3 years ago

4 0

It would weaken the bones and thy would not be as strong or tough

You might be interested in

Which statement is the correct representation of these electric field lines?

GuDViN [60]

I would say a. hope this helps

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which term describes an educated guess about the outcome of an

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Hypothesis

Explanation:

Refer to a trial solution to a problem as a hypothesis, often called an "educated guess" because it provides a suggested outcome based on the evidence.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a bicycle dynamo,does 1. The permanent magnet surrounds a conducting coil 2. The conducting coil rotates when the rear wheel

atroni [7]

Explanation:

3: the electricity is generated in the permanent magnet

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What happens in the crushing can experiment?

Dafna1 [17]

Explanation:

When hot water is poured on the can in a bucket of cold water, the can crushes off means it gets unshaped

7 0

3 years ago

Chapter 21, Problem 009 Two identical conducting spheres, fixed in place, attract each other with an electrostatic force of 0.12

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

a) -1.325 μC

b) 4.17μC

Explanation:

First, you need to know that charge is conserved. So, the adition of the charges, as there is no lost in charge, should always be the same. Also, after the wire is removed, both spheres will have the same charge, trying to find equilibrium. In summary:

$q_1 + q_2 = constant\\q_1_f = q_2_f |Then\\q_1_f + q_2_f = 2q_1_f = q_1_o+q_2_o\\q_1_f = q_2_f = \frac{q_1_o+q_2_o}{2}$

We know both q1f and q2f must be positive, because the negative charge at the beginning was the the smaller.

The electrostatic force is equal to:

$F_e = k\frac{q_1q_2}{r^2}$

K is the Coulomb constant, equal to 9*10^9 Nm^2/C^2

Now, we are told that the electrostatic force after the wire is equal to 0.0443 N:

$F_e_f = k \frac{q_1_fq_2_f}{r^2} = k\frac{\frac{q_1_o+q_2_o}{2}\frac{q_1_o+q_2_o}{2}}{r^2} = k\frac{(q_1_o+q_2_o)^2}{4r^2} \\(q_1_o+q_2_o) = \sqrt{\frac{F_e_f*4r^2}{k}} = \sqrt{\frac{0.0443N *4(0.641m)^2}{9*10^9Nm^2/C^2} } = 2.844 *10^{-6}C \\ q_1_o = 2.844*10^{-6}C - q_2_o$

Originally, the force is negative because it was an attraction force, therefore, its direction was opposite to the direction of the repulsive force after the wire:

$F_e_o = k\frac{q_1_oq_2_o}{r^2}\\ q_1_oq_2_o = \frac{F_e_o*r^2}{k} = \frac{-0.121N(0.641m)^2}{9*10^9Nm^2/C^2} = -5.524*10^{-12}$

$(2.844*10^{-6}C - q_2_o)q_2_o = -5.524*10^{-12}\\0 = q_2_o^2 - 2.844*10^{-6}q_2_o - 5.524*10^{-12}$

Solving the quadratic equation:

$q_2_o = 4.17*10^{-6}C | -1.325 * 10^{-6}C$

for this values q_1 wil be:

$q_1_o = -1.325 *10^{-6}C | 4.17*10^{-6}C$

So as you can see, the negative charge will always be -1.325 μC and the positive 4.17μC

5 0

3 years ago