What are the options u can't say that and expect me to know wat u talkin bout
Answer:
Part a)

Part b)
if both sides are rough then it will reach the same height on the other side because the energy is being conserved.
Part c)
Since marble will go to same height when it is rough while when it is smooth then it will go to the height

so on smooth it will go to lower height
Explanation:
As we know by energy conservation the total energy at the bottom of the bowl is given as

here we know that on the left side the ball is rolling due to which it is having rotational and transnational both kinetic energy
now on the right side of the bowl there is no friction
so its rotational kinetic energy will not change and remains the same
so it will have

now we know that


so we have




so the height on the smooth side is given as

Part b)
if both sides are rough then it will reach the same height on the other side because the energy is being conserved.
Part c)
Since marble will go to same height when it is rough while when it is smooth then it will go to the height

so on smooth it will go to lower height
Answer:
not captured for use by living things
Explanation:
The sun is a star with a high radiation and most of(around 55-67%) the radiation that reaches the earth is usually reflected back. The earth cannot use all the energy that reaches the earth. It uses almost around 15-30%
Answer:
Approximately
.
Explanation:
This question suggests that the rotation of this object slows down "uniformly". Therefore, the angular acceleration of this object should be constant and smaller than zero.
This question does not provide any information about the time required for the rotation of this object to come to a stop. In linear motions with a constant acceleration, there's an SUVAT equation that does not involve time:
,
where
is the final velocity of the moving object,
is the initial velocity of the moving object,
is the (linear) acceleration of the moving object, and
is the (linear) displacement of the object while its velocity changed from
to
.
The angular analogue of that equation will be:
, where
and
are the initial and final angular velocity of the rotating object,
is the angular acceleration of the moving object, and
is the angular displacement of the object while its angular velocity changed from
to
.
For this object:
, whereas
.
The question is asking for an angular acceleration with the unit
. However, the angular displacement from the question is described with the number of revolutions. Convert that to radians:
.
Rearrange the equation
and solve for
:
.