Answer:
The value of Cpk is 0.83.
Explanation:
Given that,
Upper specification limits = 10 cm
lower specification limits = 8 cm
Mean = 9.5
Standard deviation = 0.2 cm
We need to calculate the process capability
Using formula of Cpk

Put the value into the formula



Hence, The value of Cpk is 0.83.
Answer:
The beam of light is moving at the peed of:
km/min
Given:
Distance from the isalnd, d = 3 km
No. of revolutions per minute, n = 4
Solution:
Angular velocity,
(1)
Now, in the right angle in the given fig.:

Now, differentiating both the sides w.r.t t:

Applying chain rule:


Now, using
and y = 1 in the above eqn, we get:

Also, using eqn (1),


Kinetic energy increases, potencial energy decreases,
kinetic energy + potential energy = energy, energy can not be destroyed, just transformed
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.