1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Verizon [17]
3 years ago
7

Which of these is NOT an example of balanced forces? A. lying still on a bed B. a ship slowly sinking C. leaning against a brick

wall D. trying to lift a truck and being unable to
Physics
2 answers:
il63 [147K]3 years ago
7 0
A ship slowly sinking
i agree
liraira [26]3 years ago
4 0
<span>B. a ship slowly sinking</span>
This is not balanced
You might be interested in
A rugby player runs with the ball directly toward his opponent's goal, along the positive direction of an x axis. He can legally
Katyanochek1 [597]

Answer:125.68°

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
A force of 100N was necessary to lift a rock. A total of 150J of work was done. How far was the rock lifted?
Gwar [14]

Answer:

A total of 150 joules of work was done

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How do you know the earth is rotating on its axis
cupoosta [38]

Answer:

Read below!

Explanation:

You can watch the sun wheel across the sky during the day, and the stars at night. Focus a telescope on any star besides the north star--especially southern stars--and you can watch them drift across your field of view.  

An alternative explanation is that all the stars are painted on (or holes in) some canopy that rotates around the earth. This explanation does not account for the motion of the "wanderers," or planets, as the Greeks called them, or for the path of the moon among the stars.  

As we know the stars are massive bodies of significant and varying distance to the earth, the notion they all swing around us in unison seems highly implausible

4 0
3 years ago
Which choice has more thermal energy?
prohojiy [21]

Answer:

If thermal energy is the motion energy of the particles of a substance, which has more thermal energy—the cup of hot tea or a spoonful of hot tea? It makes sense that the more particles of a substance you have, then the more thermal energy the substance has. The cup of hot tea would have more thermal energy, even if the temperature of the tea is the same in the cup and in the spoon. But which cools down the quickest (has the highest rate of thermal energy transfer)—the tea in the cup or the tea in the spoon? If I have fewer particles of the same substance, then the rate of thermal energy transfer is faster. The tea in the spoon would lose thermal energy more rapidly. So the amount of a substance you have is one factor that affects the rate of thermal energy transfer.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
a ball at rest starts rolling down a hill with a constant acceleration of 3.2 meters/second2. what is the final velocity of the
Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

3.2(6.0) = 19.2 m/s

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When a marble rolls down a slope which forces acts on it ​
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Transverse waves _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Why do boys like boys
    10·1 answer
  • U
    14·1 answer
  • A student shines a mixture of red and blue light onto a blue toy car. What colour will the car appear?
    14·1 answer
  • The net force of a heavy, stationary box is?
    5·1 answer
  • A light plastic cart and a heavy steel cart are both pushed with the same force for 1.0 s, starting from rest. After the force i
    7·1 answer
  • What is the wave speed of a wave with a period of 5 seconds and a wavelength of 50 meters?
    5·1 answer
  • What is the structural unit of a substance called​
    9·1 answer
  • Help me with the following problem
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!