Answer:
Project 3.
Explanation:
Project 3's anticipated cost is 12 to 17 million dollars. It is a <em>lower </em>anticipated cost than Project 2 and Project 4, but <em>higher</em> than Project 1 by one million dollars at maximum cost anticipation. Additionally, the percentage of wildlife to benefit is 70-80%, which is <em>second</em> to the most wildlife to benefit which is Project 4 at 75-80%.
And finally, for community support for Project 3 - the chart lists it as high. This outclasses Project 2 and Project 4, but balances with Project 1. However, Project 1 costs 13 to 16 million dollars and <em>only</em> benefits 15-25% of wildlife.
1) is C because the arrows are pointing in so that means to squeeze
3) is A as the picture shows the dropper
Answer:
I had the same question and I put a total lunar eclipse.
Explanation:
A total lunar eclipse would be less widely visible because, in a partial lunar eclipse the moon only has to partly be in the Earth's shadow.
I don't know if this is helpful or not, but this is what I put if you still needed it.
Still stuck? Get 1-on-1 help from an expert tutor now.
Assuming it has no electrical charge, your electron count would be equal to the atomic number.
Hey there!:
Answer : D
A water molecule can donate a proton to another water molecule, forming H3O⁺and OH⁻ in solution.
Hope this helps!
