I believe that the answer is B. 133 N
Answer:
a. Zin = 41.25 - j 16.35 Ω
b. V₁ = 143. 6 e⁻ ¹¹ ⁴⁶
c. Pin = 216 w
d. PL = Pin = 216 w
e. Pg = 478.4 w , Pzg = 262.4 w
Explanation:
a.
Zin = Zo * [ ZL + j Zo Tan (βl) ] / [ Zo + j ZL Tan (βl) ]
βl = 2π / λ * 0.15 λ = 54 °
Zin = 50 * [ 75 + j 50 Tan (54) ] / [ 50 + j 75 Tan (54) ]
Zin = 41.25 - j 16.35 Ω
b.
I₁ = Vg / Zg + Zin ⇒ I₁ = 300 / 41.25 - j 16.35 = 3.24 e ¹⁰ ¹⁶
V₁ = I₁ * Zin = 3.24 e ¹⁰ ¹⁶ * ( 41.25 - j 16.35)
V₁ = 143. 6 e⁻ ¹¹ ⁴⁶
c.
Pin = ¹/₂ * Re * [V₁ * I₁]
Pin = ¹/₂ * 143.6 ⁻¹¹ ⁴⁶ * 3.24 e ⁻ ¹⁰ ¹⁶ = 143.6 * 3.24 / 2 * cos (21.62)
Pin = 216 w
d.
The power PL and Pin are the same as the line is lossless input to the line ends up in the load so
PL = Pin
PL = 216 w
e.
Pg Generator
Pg = ¹/₂ * Re * [ V₁ * I₁ ] = 486 * cos (10.16)
Pg = 478.4 w
Pzg dissipated
Pzg = ¹/₂ * I² * Zg = ¹/₂ * 3.24² * 50
Pzg = 262.4 w
The one that would explain why the two groups of scientists got different results is :
They had different specialties and interpreted their data differently
Probably one analyze it with x theory and the other use y theory
hope this helps
