<h2>
Answer:</h2>
Alice is correct
They are dependent
<h2>
Explanation:</h2><h2>
</h2>
<em>The code snippet can be re-written as follows;</em>
<em></em>
for(i = 1; i <= N; i = (i*2)+17 )
for(k = i+1; k <= i+N; k = k+1)
<em>Which can also be re-written as;</em>
<em></em>
for(i = 1; i <= N; i = (i*2)+17 ) {
for(k = i+1; k <= i+N; k = k+1){
}
}
In many programming languages, curly brackets are used for grouping blocks of codes. For a for loop, while loop, if statement and other related control structures, the lines of statement(s) inside their curly brackets are executed when they are encountered. In the case where any of these control statements is written without curly brackets, the next line of code (and that only) following it belongs to its block.
Consequential from the foregoing, at each of cycles of the <em>outer</em> <em>for loop</em> in the first code snippet above, the <em>inner for loop </em>will be executed. In other words, the inner for loop belongs to the block of the outer for loop though there is no curly bracket included. This also means that once a control statement has only a single line of code to be executed or to be a part of its block, curly brackets are not required. Therefore, the two versions of code snippets written above are identical and equivalent.
With the aforementioned, it is easy to say and see that the Alice is correct that the loops are dependent on each other.