Is their a multiple choice to choose from I'm not sure the answer I got is even right.
That would be very helpful.
Answer:

Explanation:
Given that:
- Area of the plate of capacitor 1= Area of the plate of capacitor 2=A
- separation distance of capacitor 2,

- separation distance of capacitor 1,

- quantity of charge on capacitor 2,

- quantity of charge on capacitor 1,

We know that the Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor is directly proportional to the area and inversely proportional to the distance of separation.
Mathematically given as:
.....................................(1)
where:
k = relative permittivity of the dielectric material between the plates= 1 for air

From eq. (1)
For capacitor 2:

For capacitor 1:

![C_1=\frac{1}{2} [ \frac{k.\epsilon_0.A}{d}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=C_1%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bk.%5Cepsilon_0.A%7D%7Bd%7D%5D)
We know, potential differences across a capacitor is given by:
..........................................(2)
where, Q = charge on the capacitor plates.
for capacitor 2:


& for capacitor 1:


![V_1=8\times [\frac{Q.d}{k.\epsilon_0.A}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=V_1%3D8%5Ctimes%20%5B%5Cfrac%7BQ.d%7D%7Bk.%5Cepsilon_0.A%7D%5D)

That ratio is called"efficiency". It doesn't need to be a percent.
It can just as well be a fraction or a decimal number.
Answer:
A. The project's energy costs will decrease
Explanation:
Since the project is located in an area with a demand-response program and on a site that has enough room for a wind-turbine to allow for on-site renewable energy.
Hence, the project's energy costs will decrease very well because it's implementing both of these strategies;
- Area with demand-response program.
- On-site renewable energy.
Answer:
22.26 years
, 15.585 light years , 11.13 light years
Explanation:
a)

= 
= 22.26 years
b)
0.7*c*22.26 years
=15.585 light years
c)
0.7*c*15.9
=11.13 light years