Answer:
5.44×10⁶ m
Explanation:
For a satellite with period t and orbital radius r, the velocity is:
v = 2πr/t
So the centripetal acceleration is:
a = v² / r
a = (2πr/t)² / r
a = (2π/t)² r
This is equal to the acceleration due to gravity at that elevation:
g = MG / r²
(2π/t)² r = MG / r²
M = (2π/t)² r³ / G
At the surface of the planet, the acceleration due to gravity is:
g = MG / R²
Substituting our expression for the mass of the planet M:
g = [(2π/t)² r³ / G] G / R²
g = (2π/t)² r³ / R²
R² = (2π/t)² r³ / g
R = (2π/t) √(r³ / g)
Given that t = 1.30 h = 4680 s, r = 7.90×10⁶ m, and g = 30.0 m/s²:
R = (2π / 4680 s) √((7.90×10⁶ m)³ / 30.0 m/s²)
R = 5.44×10⁶ m
Notice we didn't need to know the mass of the satellite.
I’m guessing convection currents since you mention mantle and core, reminds me of heat
Answer:0.50 atm
Explanation:(1atm)(75 L)=p2(150 L)
Answer:
147.15 Joules.
Explanation:
A 3 kilogram mass at a height of 5 meters, while acted on by Earth's gravity would have 147.15 Joules of potential energy, PE = 3kg * 9.81 m/s2 * 5m = 147.15 J.
None of the choices is an acceptable answer.
Light ... as well as all other forms of electromagnetic radiation ... is both. When you run light through an experiment built to detect particles ... such as photoelectric stimulation of electron emission ... the light behaves like a stream of particles. When you set up an experiment built to measure and detect waves ... like reflection, refraction, diffraction, dispersion, constructive and destructive interference ... the light does all of those things too.
Scientists would only debate the question if light absolutely positively had to be one or the other, and could not possibly be both. Such a debate isn't necessary, and scientists no longer waste their time arguing about it. Light is both.
Between Maxwell and Einstein, the wave/particle duality of light had been convincingly demonstrated well over a hundred years ago.
