A high quality insecticide applied all along the axis and the surrounding area can protect against a recurrence for a substantial period of time.
If an electron, a proton, and a deuteron move in a magnetic field with the same momentum perpendicularly, the ratio of the radii of their circular paths will be:
<h3>How is the ratio of the perpendicular parts obtained?</h3>
To obtain the ratio of the perpendicular parts, one begins bdy noting that the mass of the proton = 1m, the mass of deuteron = 2m, and the mass of the alpha particle = 4m.
The ratio of the radii of the parts can be obtained by finding the root of the masses and dividing this by the charge. When the coefficients are substituted into the formula, we will have:
r = √m/e : √2m/e : √4m/2e
When resolved, the resulting ratios will be:
1: √2 : 1
Learn more about the radii of their circular paths here:
brainly.com/question/16816166
#SPJ4
I was about to say: because people generally get comfortable with
what they think they know, and don't like the discomfort of being told
that they have to change something they're comfortable with.
But then I thought about it a little bit more, and I have a different answer.
"Society" might initially reject a new scientific theory, because 'society'
is totally unequipped to render judgement of any kind regarding any
development in Science.
First of all, 'Society' is a thing that's made of a bunch of people, so it's
inherently unequipped to deal with scientific news. Anything that 'Society'
decides has a lot of the mob psychology in it, and a public opinion poll or
a popularity contest are terrible ways to evaluate a scientific discovery.
Second, let's face it. The main ingredient that comprises 'Society' ... people ...
are generally uneducated, unknowledgeable, unqualified, and clueless in the
substance, the history, and the methods of scientific inquiry and reporting.
There may be very good reasons that some particular a new scientific theory
should be rejected, or at least seriously questioned. But believe me, 'Society'
doesn't have them.
That's pretty much why.
Answer:
Total work done in expansion will be 
Explanation:
We have given pressure P = 2.10 atm
We know that 1 atm 
So 2.10 atm 
Volume is increases from 3370 liter to 5.40 liter
So initial volume 
And final volume 
So change in volume 
For isobaric process work done is equal to 
So total work done in expansion will be
