Answer:
The inequality is
2 x - 6 > 6(x -2) +8
To solve the inequality we will first use distributive property with respect to multiplication over subtraction
And then bring constant on one side and variable on another side keeping the inequality maintained
2 x -6 > 6 x -12 + 8
2 x -6 > 6 x - 4
6 x - 2 x< -6+4
4 x < -2
Dividing both sides by 2
x < 
Now i will draw the graph of above function.
Step-by-step explanation:
- ATTACHED IS THE SOLUTION.
- Tell me if you have any questions.
(100 + __ )+ 290 - 67.0034 = 411.9966
First add 67.0034 to both sides:
(100 + __ )+ 290 = 479
Now subtract 290 from both sides:
(100 + __ ) = 189
Subtract 100 from both sides:
189-100 = 89
The missing value is 89
Imagine first splitting 6 wholes up into fourths. That means that, for each whole (each 1) in 6, we're creating 4 equal slices. This gives us 4 x 6 = 24 total slices, which we call <em>fourths</em>. How many groups of <em>3 fourths </em>(3/4) can you make out of those <em>24 fourths </em>(24/4)? If we throw aside the label <em>fourths</em> for a minute, in general, if we have 24 <em>things</em>, how many groups of 3 <em>things</em> can we make out of those? Well, our answer there would just be 24 ÷ 3 = 8 groups.
The same thing applies to fourths. If we have 24/4, and we divide it by 3/4, we get 24 ÷ 3 = 8 groups again, so our answer is <em />8 3/4-pound packages.
Answer:
The question might be centered on computation on the hourly rate earned by the three friends:
Nina $12.69
Ty $8.25
Kim $8.60
Step-by-step explanation:
Hourly rate earned=total earnings/hours worked
Nina:
Nina earned $177.60 for 14 hours,hence hourly rate is $ 12.69 ($177.60/14)
Ty:
Ty earned $148.50 for 18 hours period of work,thus earned $8.25 ($148.50/18)
Kim earned $137.60 for 16 hours duration of work,invariably Kim earned $8.60 ($137.60/16)
From the above analysis it is clear that Nina earned the highest hourly rate of $12.69 per hour
