Im pretty sure that they do
Answer:
a) A = 3 cm, b) T = 0.4 s, f = 2.5 Hz,
2) A standing wave the displacement of the wave is canceled and only one oscillation remains
Explanation:
a) in an oscillatory movement the amplitude is the highest value of the signal in this case
A = 3 cm
b) the period of oscillation is the time it takes for the wave to repeat itself in this case
T = 0.4 s
the period is the inverse of the frequency
f = 1 /T
f = 1 /, 0.4
f = 2.5 Hz
2) a traveling wave is a wave for which as time increases the displacement increases, in the case of a transverse wave the oscillation is perpendicular to the displacement and in the case of a longitudinal wave the oscillation is in the same direction of the displacement.
A standing wave occurs when a traveling wave bounces off some object and there are two waves, one that travels in one direction and the other that travels in the opposite direction. In this case, the displacement of the wave is canceled and only one oscillation remains.
The gravitational force between the Earth and the satellite (its "weight") is inversely proportional to the distance between the centers of both objects.
On the surface, their centers are separated by 1 Earth radius.
12,000 miles above the surface, they're separated by 4 Earth radiii.
(4/1) = 4
So after the move, the satellite's weight is (1/4²) = 1/16 of its surface weight.
(321 lb) / (16) = (20 and a hair) lb
The correct choice from the given list is " <em>>20 lb "</em> .
"Multiple accelerations" is a puzzling phrase, and I'd be curious to understand it
better. Sadly however, you haven't explained it at all.
If the multiple accelerations are the accelerations of multiple objects, then
the net force on each object is the product of (its mass) x (its acceleration).
If the multiple accelerations are the acceleration of one object at different times,
then at any instant of time, the net force on the object is the product of (its mass) x
(its acceleration at that instant).
From t=0 onwards I changes slowly and V changes abruptly across the inductor.
At time t=0, the voltage across the inductor equalises the battery voltage; nevertheless, Lenz's Law states that this induced EMF will always be opposed to the polarity of the battery. The voltage across the inductor is equivalent to the voltage of a battery because the inductor at time zero behaves like a second battery of the same voltage linked in reverse.
Because current can never be zero, voltage across the inductor decreases with time. If it did, there would be no back EMF to stop the current from flowing through the inductor because the magnetic field would not be changing. As a result, the inductor will become less of an open circuit as the current increases over time. The inductor will essentially behave like a resistor.
Learn more about inductor here:
brainly.com/question/15893850
#SPJ4