Explanation:
guxxxhchclcyffktx
oye hoye thanks for point ✌✌✌✌✌
The power required to force the current of 4.13 A to flow through the conductor is 1927.43 watts
<h3>What is power? </h3>
This is defined as the rate in which energy is consumed. Electrical power is expressed mathematically as:
Power (P) = square current (I²)× resistancet (R)
P = I²R
<h3>How to determine the power</h3>
- Current (I) = 4.13 A
- Resistance (R) = 113 ohms
- Power (P) =?
P = I²R
P = 4.13² × 113
P = 1927.43 watts
Thus, the power required is 1927.43 watts
Learn more about electrical power:
brainly.com/question/64224
#SPJ1
"<span>increases when pressure decreases". Pressure and volume of gasses are related from Boyle's law, which states that Pressure is proportional to 1/V, so as pressure decreases, volume increases. </span>
Answer:
The correct option is;
B) No, the Navy vessel is slower
Explanation:
The speed of some torpedoes can be as high as 370 km/h. The average speed of a fast Navy vessel is approximately 110 km/h
Therefore, the torpedoes travel approximately 3 times as fast as the (slower) Navy vessel, such that the torpedo covers three times the distance of the Navy vessel in the same time and therefore, if the Navy vessel and the torpedo continue in a straight line (in the same direction) due north the vessel can not outrun the torpedo
Therefore, no the Navy vessel travels slower than a torpedo.
Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx