Answer:
Accuracy is the closeness to the specific target and precision is the closeness of the measurements to each other.
Answer: A thing that died a long time ago, and it's bones were preserved in the ground.
Explanation:
Because yes
![176.0 \; \text{kJ} \cdot \text{mol}^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=176.0%20%5C%3B%20%5Ctext%7BkJ%7D%20%5Ccdot%20%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5E%7B-1%7D)
As long as the equation in question can be expressed as the sum of the three equations with known enthalpy change, its
can be determined with the Hess's Law. The key is to find the appropriate coefficient for each of the given equations.
Let the three equations with
given be denoted as (1), (2), (3), and the last equation (4). Let
,
, and
be letters such that
. This relationship shall hold for all chemicals involved.
There are three unknowns; it would thus take at least three equations to find their values. Species present on both sides of the equation would cancel out. Thus, let coefficients on the reactant side be positive and those on the product side be negative, such that duplicates would cancel out arithmetically. For instance,
shall resemble the number of
left on the product side when the second equation is directly added to the third. Similarly
Thus
and
![-\frac{1}{2} \times (1) + \frac{1}{2} \times (2) - \frac{1}{2} \times (3)= (4)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%281%29%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%282%29%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%283%29%3D%20%284%29)
Verify this conclusion against a fourth species involved-
for instance. Nitrogen isn't present in the net equation. The sum of its coefficient shall, therefore, be zero.
![a + b = -1/2 + 1/2 = 0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=a%20%2B%20b%20%3D%20-1%2F2%20%2B%201%2F2%20%3D%200)
Apply the Hess's Law based on the coefficients to find the enthalpy change of the last equation.
![\Delta H _{(4)} = -\frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(1)} + \frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(2)} - \frac{1}{2} \; \Delta H _{(3)}\\\phantom{\Delta H _{(4)}} = -\frac{1}{2} \times (-628.9)+ \frac{1}{2} \times (-92.2) - \frac{1}{2} \times (184.7) \\\phantom{\Delta H _{(4)}} = 176.0 \; \text{kJ} \cdot \text{mol}^{-1}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%284%29%7D%20%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5C%3B%20%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%281%29%7D%20%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5C%3B%20%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%282%29%7D%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5C%3B%20%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%283%29%7D%5C%5C%5Cphantom%7B%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%284%29%7D%7D%20%3D%20-%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%28-628.9%29%2B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%28-92.2%29%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes%20%28184.7%29%20%5C%5C%5Cphantom%7B%5CDelta%20H%20_%7B%284%29%7D%7D%20%3D%20176.0%20%5C%3B%20%5Ctext%7BkJ%7D%20%5Ccdot%20%5Ctext%7Bmol%7D%5E%7B-1%7D)
Answer:
All of them
Explanation:
All of those are properties of metals
Answer:
The answer is Relative plenitude alludes to the amount of a specific isotope is available in a given measure of test.
Explanation:
The 'relative plenitude' of an isotope implies the level of that specific isotope that happens in nature. Most components are comprised of a blend of isotopes. The total of the rates of the particular isotopes must indicate 100%. The relative nuclear mass is the weighted normal of the isotopic masses. The percent plenitude of every sort of sweets reveals to you what number of every sort of Aufbau there are in each 100 CANDIES. Percent wealth is additionally relative plenitude. This is only a method for giving us a photo on which kind exists all the more every now and again.