Explanation:
Below is an attachment containing the solution.
Answer:
Zero work done,since the body isn't acting against or by gravity.
Explanation:
Gravitational force is usually considered as work done against gravity (-ve) and work by gravity ( +ve ) and also When work isn't done by or against gravity work done in this case is zero.
Gravitational force can be define as that force that attracts a body to any other phyical body or system that have mass.
The planet been considered as our system in this case is assumed to have mass, and ought to demonstrate such properties associated with gravitational force in such system. Such properties include the return of every object been thrown up as a result of gravity acting downwards. The orbiting nature of object along an elliptical part when gravitational force isn't acting on the body and it is assumed to be zero.
Answer:
C) steel turning to rust in salt air
Explanation:
The missing options are:
A) ice melting to form liquid water
B) water boiling to form steam
C) steel turning to rust in salt air
D) sugar dissolving into hot coffee
In a chemical change the atoms of the reacting compounds are reordered forming new compounds. In a chemical change, new compounds appear, but in a physical change not.
Then, change of states like ice melting and water boiling are not chemical changes.
During steel rust, components of steel, like iron, are oxidized, that is, reacts with oxygen forming oxides.
The dissolution of sugar into hot coffee is a physical change in which sugar molecules get further apart in the coffee, but they don't change.
Answer:
Therefore the correct statement is B.
Explanation:
In the interference and diffraction phenomena, the natural wave of electromagnetic radiation must be taken into account, the wave front that advances towards the slit can be considered as when it reaches it behaves like a series of wave emitters, each slightly out of phase from the previous one, following the Huygens principle that states that each point is compiled as a source of secondary waves.
The sum of all these waves results in the diffraction curve of the slit that has the shape
I = Io sin² θ /θ²
Where the angle is a function of the wavelength and the width of the slit.
From the above, the interference phenomenon can be treated as the sum of two diffraction phenomena displaced a distance equal to the separation of the slits (d)
Therefore the correct statement is B
