It can be both flat or it can be when you have new eyeglasses on and you look down it makes you think the ground looks like that but its not
Rutherford's model of the atom (ESAAQ) Rutherford carried out some experiments which led to a change in ideas around the atom. His new model described the atom as a tiny, dense, positively charged core called a nucleus surrounded by lighter, negatively charged electrons.
That's 105 km that he flew, or 65.2 miles ! I'm absolutely positive
that the crow must have landed and gotten some rest when you
weren't looking. But that had no effect on his displacement when
he got where he was going, so we can continue to solve the problem:
The displacement is the distance and direction from the place
where the crow took off to the place where he landed.
-- It's distance is the hypotenuse of the right triangle whose legs
are 60 km and 45 km.
D² = (60 km)² + (45 km)²
= 3,600 km² + 2,025 km² = 5,625 km²
D = √(5625 km²) = 75 km .
-- It's direction is the angle whose tangent is (45 S / 60 W).
tan⁻¹ (45/60) = tan⁻¹ (0.75) = 36.9° south of west
= 53.1° west of south.
= not exactly southwest but close.
Answer:
Explanation:
Here image distance is fixed .
In the first case if v be image distance
1 / v - 1 / -25 = 1 / .05
1 / v = 1 / .05 - 1 / 25
= 20 - .04 = 19.96
v = .0501 m = 5.01 cm
In the second case
u = 4 ,
1 / v - 1 / - 4 = 1 / .05
1 / v = 20 - 1 / 4 = 19.75
v = .0506 = 5.06 cm
So lens must be moved forward by 5.06 - 5.01 = .05 cm ( away from film )
I think the answer would be 1 watt but i'm not sure