Answer:
American Holly, Black Pine, Blue Pacific Juniper, Blue Dune Grass, Artemesia) MODERATELY SALT TOLERANT: plants always need protection from salt spray but will tolerate some inundations by storm surges. They are best used behind fences or buildings. (
Answer:
The order of solubility is AgBr < Ag₂CO₃ < AgCl
Explanation:
The solubility constant give us the molar solubilty of ionic compounds. In general for a compound AB the ksp will be given by:
Ksp = (A) (B) where A and B are the molar solubilities = s² (for compounds with 1:1 ratio).
It follows then that the higher the value of Ksp the greater solubilty of the compound if we are comparing compounds with the same ionic ratios:
Comparing AgBr: Ksp = 5.4 x 10⁻¹³ with AgCl: Ksp = 1.8 x 10⁻¹⁰, AgCl will be more soluble.
Comparing Ag2CO3: Ksp = 8.0 x 10⁻¹² with AgCl Ksp = AgCl: Ksp = 1.8 x 10⁻¹⁰ we have the complication of the ratio of ions 2:1 in Ag2CO3, so the answer is not obvious. But since we know that
Ag2CO3 ⇄ 2 Ag⁺ + CO₃²₋
Ksp Ag2CO3 = 2s x s = 2 s² = 8.0 x 10-12
s = 4 x 10⁻12 ∴ s= 2 x 10⁻⁶
And for AgCl
AgCl ⇄ Ag⁺ + Cl⁻
Ksp = s² = 1.8 x 10⁻¹⁰ ∴ s = √ 1.8 x 10⁻¹⁰ = 1.3 x 10⁻⁵
Therefore, AgCl is more soluble than Ag₂CO₃
The order of solubility is AgBr < Ag₂CO₃ < AgCl
Answer:
0.0277 M.
Explanation:
The integral rate law of a first order reaction:
<em>Kt = ln ([A₀]/[A]),</em>
where, k is the rate constant of the reaction <em>(k = 3.36 × 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹)</em>,
t is the time of the reaction <em>(t = 235.0 min = 14100 s)</em>,
[A₀] is the initial concentration of cyclopropane <em>([A₀] = 0.0445 M)</em>
<em>∵ Kt = ln ([A₀]/[A]),</em>
∴ (3.36 × 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹)(14100 s) = ln (0.0445 M)/[A]
Taking the exponential of both sides:
1.6 = (0.0445 M)/[A]
<em>∴ [A] = (0.0445 M)/1.6 = 0.0277 M.</em>
<em />
If copper is heated with iron oxide there is no obvious reaction because
copper is less reactive than iron.
On a reactivity chart, copper is far below iron. This makes it impossible for a replacement reaction to occur, so the equation doesn't change.
I hope I helped!
<span>So to make it clear let's break the equation down species by species and assess the number of each species on bothe sides of the equation:
2C</span>₈H₈ + 25O₂ → 8CO₂ + 18H₂<span>O
LHS: C - 16 RHS: C - 8
H - 16 H - 36
O - 50 O - 34
Thus based on that it is evident that the equation is not quite balanced. This therefore means a "</span><span>No, because the number of carbon, hydrogen & oxygen atoms on both sides of the equation are not equal."
</span>The actual balance equation would be C₈H₈ + 10O₂ → 8CO₂ + 4H₂O
