Using the Universal Gratitation Law, we have:
Again applying the formula in the new situation, comes:
Number 4If you notice any mistake in my english, please let me know, because i am not native.
The equilibrium condition allows finding the result for the force that the chair exerts on the student is:
- The reaction force that the chair exerts on the student's support is equal to the student's weight.
Newton's second law gives the relationship between force, mass and acceleration of bodies, in the special case that the acceleration is is zero equilibrium condition.
∑ F = 0
Where F is the external force.
The free body diagram is a diagram of the forces on bodies without the details of the shape of the body, in the attached we can see a diagram of the forces.
Let's analyze the force on the chair.
Let's analyze the forces on the student.
In conclusion using the equilibrium condition we can find the result for the force that the chair exerts on the student is:
- The reaction force that the chair exerts on the student's support is equal to the student's weight.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18117041
Let both the balls have the same mass equals to m.
Let
and
be the speed of the ball1 and the ball2 respectively, such that

Assuming that both the balls are at the same level with respect to the ground, so let h be the height from the ground.
The total energy of ball1= Kinetic energy of ball1 + Potential energy of ball1. The Kinetic energy of any object moving with speed,
, is 
and the potential energy is due to the change in height is
[where
is the acceleration due to gravity]
So, the total energy of ball1,

and the total energy of ball1,
.
Here, the potential energy for both the balls are the same, but the kinetic energy of the ball1 is higher the ball2 as the ball1 have the higher speed, refer equation (i)
So, 
Now, from equations (ii) and (iii)
The total energy of ball1 hi higher than the total energy of ball2.
Just subsitute and easy
v=55m/s
m=100kg
KE=(0.5)(100kg)(55m/s)^2
KE=(50kg)(3025 m^2/s^2)
KE=151250 J
2nd option
It is false. The effect of freezing is almost the exact opposite