Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

12

A 7.00-g bullet, when fired from a gun into a 1.00-kg block of wood held in a vise, penetrates the block to a depth of 8.00 cm.

This block of wood is next placed on a frictionless horizontal surface, and a second 7.00-g bullet is fired from the gun into the block. To what depth will the bullet penetrate the block in this case?

1 answer:

gulaghasi [49]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

In the second case there's no way to know what depth the bullet will penetrate into the block.

Explanation:

Since the block is on a <em>frictionless </em>surface, when hitted by the bullet, this last one could barely penetrate the surface of the block and, both, start moving as one (<em>perfectly inellastic collition</em>) since here, there's no vise to hold the block into place.

You might be interested in

The magnetic field created around a single wire is _________.

Margarita [4]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

it is weak I hope it helps u have a great day

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

FILL IN THE BLANKS here on earth, the pull of gravity on a mass of 1 kg is ......... newtons

Aleks [24]

Answer:

9.8 Newton

Explanation:

At average gravity on earth (conventionally, g=9.80665m/s2),

a kilogram mass exerts a force of about 9.8 newton

I hope this answer helps you

4 0

2 years ago

What is in the blank?

Vika [28.1K]

This is in the thermosphere which is at an altitude of 85-520km

8 0

3 years ago

Two isolated, concentric, conducting spherical shells have radii R1 = 0.500 m and R2 = 1.00 m, uniform charges q1=+2.00 µC and q

scZoUnD [109]

Complete Question

The diagram for this question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

a E = $1.685*10^3 N/C$

b E = $36.69*10^3 N/C$

c E = 0 N/C

d $V = 6.7*10^3 V$

e $V = 26.79*10^3V$

f V = $34.67 *10^3 V$

g $V= 44.95*10^3 V$

h $V= 44.95*10^3 V$

i $V= 44.95*10^3 V$

Explanation:

From the question we are given that

The first charge $q_1 = 2.00 \mu C = 2.00*10^{-6} C$

The second charge $q_2 =1.00 \muC = 1.00*10^{-6}$

The first radius $R_1 = 0.500m$

The second radius $R_2 = 1.00m$

$Generally \ Electric \ field = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q_1+\ q_2}{r^2}$

And $Potential \ Difference = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1 }{r}+\frac{q_2}{R_2} ]$

The objective is to obtain the the magnitude of electric for different cases

And the potential difference for other cases

Considering a

r = 4.00 m

$E = \frac{((2+1)*10^{-6})*8.99*10^9}{16}$

$= 1.685*10^3 N/C$

Considering b

$r = 0.700 m \ , R_2 > r > R_1$

This implies that the electric field would be

$E = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{q_1}{r^2}$

This because it the electric filed of the charge which is below it in distance that it would feel

$E = 8*99*10^9 \frac{2*10^{-6}}{0.4900}$

= $36.69*10^3 N/C$

Considering c

r = 0.200 m

=> $r$

The electric field = 0

This is because the both charge are above it in terms of distance so it wont feel the effect of their electric field

Considering d

r = 4.00 m

=> $r > R_1 >r>R_2$

Now the potential difference is

$V =\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \frac{q_1 + \ q_2}{r} = 8.99*10^9 * \frac{3*10^{-6}}{4} = 6.7*10^3 V$

This so because the distance between the charge we are considering is further than the two charges given

Considering e

r = 1.00 m $R_2 = r > R_1$

$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} \frac{1.00*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 26.79 *10^3 V$

Considering f

$r = 0.700 m \ , R_2 > r > R_1$

$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.700} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 34.67 *10^3 V$

Considering g

$r =0.500\m , R_1 >r =R_1$

$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{r} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V$

Considering h

$r =0.200\m , R_1 >R_1>r$

$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V$

Considering i

$r =0\ m \ , R_1 >R_1>r$

$V = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} [\frac{q_1}{R_1} +\frac{q_2}{R_2} ] = 8.99*10^9 * [\frac{2.00*10^{-6}}{0.500} \frac{1.0*10^{-6}}{1.00} ] = 44.95 *10^3 V$

8 0

3 years ago

North Dakota Electric Company estimates its demand trend line (in millions of kilowatt hours) to be: D = 75.0 + 0.45Q, whe

Alborosie

Answer:

The demand forecast for winter is 96.36 millions KWH

The demand forecast for spring is 145.08 millions KWH

The demand forecast for summer is 169.89 millions KWH

The demand forecast for fall is 73.08 millions KWH

Explanation:

Given that,

The demand trend line is

$D=(75.0+0.45Q)\times multiplicative\ seasonal\ factors$

We need to calculate the demand forecast for winter

Using given formula

$D=(75.0+0.45Q)\times multiplicative\ seasonal\ factors$

Put the value into the formula

$D=(75.0+0.45\times101)\times0.80$

$D=96.36\ millions\ KWH$

We need to calculate the demand forecast for spring

Using given formula

$D=(75.0+0.45Q)\times multiplicative\ seasonal\ factors$

Put the value into the formula

$D=(75.0+0.45\times102)\times1.20$

$D=145.08\ millions\ KWH$

We need to calculate the demand forecast for summer

Using given formula

$D=(75.0+0.45Q)\times multiplicative\ seasonal\ factors$

Put the value into the formula

$D=(75.0+0.45\times103)\times1.40$

$D=169.89\ millions KWH$

We need to calculate the demand forecast for fall

Using given formula

$D=(75.0+0.45Q)\times multiplicative\ seasonal\ factors$

Put the value into the formula

$D=(75.0+0.45\times104)\times0.60$

$D=73.08\ millions KWH$

Hence, The demand forecast for winter is 96.36 millions KWH

The demand forecast for spring is 145.08 millions KWH

The demand forecast for summer is 169.89 millions KWH

The demand forecast for fall is 73.08 millions KWH

3 0

3 years ago