No. A neutron star is the weird remains of a star that blew its outer layers off
in a nova event, and then had enough mass left so that gravity crushed its
electrons into its protons, and then what was left of it shrank down to a sphere
of unimaginably dense neutron soup. But it didn't have enough mass to go
any farther than that.
A black hole is the remains of a star that had enough mass to go even farther
than that. No force in the universe was able to stop it from contracting, so it
kept contracting until its mass occupied no volume ... zero. It became even
more weird, and is composed of a substance that we don't know anything about
and can't describe, and occupies zero volume.
Contrary to popular fairy tales, a black hole doesn't reach out and "suck things in".
It's just so small (zero) that things can get very close to it. You know that gravity
gets stronger as you get closer to an object, so if the object has no size at all, you
can get really really close to it, and THAT's where the gravity gets really strong.
You may weigh, let's say, 100 pounds on the Earth. But you're like 4,000 miles
from the center of the Earth. What if all of the earth's mass was crammed into
the size of a bean. Then you could get 1 inch from it, and at that distance from
the mass of the Earth, you would weigh 25,344,000,000 pounds.
But Earth's mass is not enough to make a black hole. That takes a minimum
of about 3 times the mass of the sun, which is right about 1 million times the
Earth's mass. THEN you can get a lightweight black hole.
Do you see how it works now ?
I know. It all seems too fantastic to be true.
It sure does.
The instantaneous velocity is how the position is changing with respect to time in a specific point in time, as opposed to the average value given by Delta(x)/Delta(t). It's given by taking a limit of Delta(x)/Delta(t) where t approaches 0, that is, by derivating x(t) in respect to t.
v(t) = x'(t) = (28 + 12.4t + 0.045t^3)' = 12.4 + 0.135t^2
But we want to find the velocity at t = 8s:
v(8) = 12.4 + 0.135*(8)^2 = 21.04m/s
The first law
In Newtons first law it states that an object will not change its motion unless a force acts upon it.
There are some missing data in the problem. The full text is the following:
"<span>A </span>real<span> (</span>non-Carnot<span>) </span>heat engine<span>, </span>operating between heat reservoirs<span> at </span>temperatures<span> of 710 K and 270 K </span>performs 4.1 kJ<span> of </span>net work<span>, and </span>rejects<span> 9.7 </span>kJ<span> of </span>heat<span>, in a </span>single cycle<span>. The </span>thermal efficiency<span> of a </span>Carnot heat<span> engine, operating between the same </span>heat<span> reservoirs, in percent, is closest to.."
Solution:
The efficiency of a Carnot cycle working between cold temperature </span>

and hot temperature

is given by

and it represents the maximum efficiency that can be reached by a machine operating between these temperatures. If we use the temperatures of the problem,

and

, the efficiency is

Therefore, the correct answer is D) 62 %.
Answer:

Explanation:
To solve this problem we need to apply the concept related to Angular Acceleration. We can find it through the equation

Where for definition,

The number of revolution
was given by 20 times, then


We know as well that the salad rotates 6 more times, therefore in angle measurements that is

The cook at the end stop to spin, then using our first equation,

re-arrange to solve
,


We can know find the required time,

Re-arrange to find t, and considering that 



Therefore take for the salad spinner to come to rest is 3 seconds with acceleration of 