Answer:
The heat loss rate through one of the windows made of polycarbonate is 252W. If the window is made of aerogel, the heat loss rate is 16.8W. If the window is made of soda-lime glass, the heat loss rate is 1190.4W.
The cost associated with the heat loss through the windows for an 8-hour flight is:
For aerogel windows: $17.472 (most efficient)
For polycarbonate windows: $262.08
For soda-lime glass windows: $1,238.016 (least efficient)
Explanation:
To calculate the heat loss rate through the window, we can use a model of heat transmission by conduction throw flat wall. Using unidimensional Fourier law:

In this case:

If we replace the data provided by the problem we get the heat loss rate through one of the windows of each material (we only have to change the thermal conductivities).
To obtain the thermal conductivity of the soda-lime glass we use the graphic attached to this answer (In this case for soda-lime glass k₃₀₀=0.992w/m·K).
To calculate the cost associated with the heat loss through the windows for an 8-hour flight we use this formula (using the heat loss rate calculated in each case):

Neutral posture is essential for optimal wellbeing and functioning of the body. Holding the weight of the body The most important function of a neutral posture is to maintain the body in an upright position, supporting the body against gravity
Both technicians are correct
Explanation:
They are each correct for separate reasons. Tech A is correct due to pressure and temperature both being important factors and quantities to vaporize anything. Tech B is correct due to fuel particles being easier to burn due to their chemical structure.
Explanation:
1) Work done = force x distance x cos(θ)
= 0.15 x 6 x cos(30)
= 0.779
2) Ek = ½mv²
v = acceleration due to gravity so 9.81
Ek = ½(2)(9.81)²
Ek = 96.2361
3) v = (√(2em)) / m
= (√(2(96.2361)(2)) / 2
= 9.81 so especially with no time given, I can only assume the acceleration due to gravity but take it with a pinch of salt.
Answer:
i really font onow why tbh eot you