All categories

3 years ago

Explain why are metals good conductors and why covalent bonds are not

1 answer:

3 0

While ionic bonds join metals to nonmetals, and covalent bonds join nonmetals to nonmetals, metallic bonds are responsible for the bonding between metal atoms. ... Metals are good conductors of electricity because the electrons in the electron sea are free to flow and carry electric current.

You might be interested in

(a) Write the dissolution reaction for solid Na2CO3 below. (Use the lowest possible coefficients. Include states-of-matter under

Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

For a: The chemical equation for the dissolution of sodium carbonate is $Na_2CO_3(s)\rightarrow Na_2CO_3(aq.)$

For b: The net acid-base reaction is $CO_3^{2-}(aq.)+H_2O(l)\rightarrow OH^-(aq.)+HCO_3^-(aq.)$

Explanation:

For a:

Dissolution reaction is defined as the reaction in which a solid compound gets dissolved in water to form aqueous solution.

The chemical equation for the dissolution of sodium carbonate follows:

$Na_2CO_3(s)\rightarrow Na_2CO_3(aq.)$

Ionization reaction is defined as the reaction in which an ionic compound dissociates into its ions when dissolved in aqueous solution.

The chemical equation for the ionization of sodium carbonate follows:

$Na_2CO_3(aq.)\rightarrow 2Na^+(aq.)+CO_3^{3-}(aq.)$

For b:

Now, the anion formed which is $CO_3^{2-}$ reacts with water to form conjugate acid.

The chemical equation for the reaction of anion with water follows:

$CO_3^{2-}(aq.)+H_2O(l)\rightarrow OH^-(aq.)+HCO_3^-(aq.)$

Hence, the net acid-base reaction of the anion formed and water is written above.

3 0

3 years ago

Scientists often work on projects for a long time and fail to see sources of error in their research. Which process allows an ou

prohojiy [21]

Answer:

The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).

Explanation:

Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.

Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A chemist conducted a study on ammonia NH3(g) into hydrogen gas and nitrogen gas. This reaction is represented by the following

Lelu [443]

Answer:

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Calculate the mass of 4.60 x 10^25 atoms of neon?

enyata [817]

I think it’s B 5.54 x 10^2g

4 0

3 years ago

If the length of a string increases 2 times but the mass of the string remains constant, the new density of the string will equa

Genrish500 [490]

If the length of a string increases 2 times but the mass of the string remains constant, the original density will be multiplied by a factor mathematically given as

v=1.414 times

<h3>Will the new density of the string equal the original density multiplied by what factor?</h3>

Generally, the equation for the volume is mathematically given as

v = sqt(TL/m)

Where

density = mass/length

Therefore

$v2/v1 = \sqrt{L2/L1}$

$v2/v1 = \sqrt{2}$

In conclusion,v ratio will give us

v=1.414 times