Answer: This would more a practical feedback than scientific.
Explanation: Despite of the protocols and processes scientists need to develop in order to stablish a new source of energy or daily life option, logistic issues are one of the most important things on the "to do list".
Would it be very expensive to acquire this kind of fuel? Is it efficient? Is it dangerous to human life or the environment? What about the negative reactions this brand new fuel could have in society?.
No that is false
Because its a organism. Which means at one point it was a live. It just died. You cant die if you were never alive. So that means that at one time was living.
But nonliving thing in science is like a piece of plastic cant breath eat die non living
If this was helpful pls mark be as brainliest!!!!!!!!
The internal energy of the gas is 49,200 J
Explanation:
The internal energy of a diatomic gas, such as 
, is given by
where
n is the number of moles
R is the gas constant
T is the absolute temperature of the gas
For the gas in this problem, we have:
n = 4.50 (number of moles)
R = 8.31 J/(mol·K) (gas constant)
(absolute temperature)
Substituting, we find:
Learn more about ideal gases:
brainly.com/question/9321544
brainly.com/question/7316997
brainly.com/question/3658563
#LearnwithBrainly
Because a nuclear meltdown can be caused if systems fail.
Answer:
Since the distance between the pivot and its weight is zero, the moment of its weight about the pivot (= weight × 0) is zero. Hence, the weight of the ruler can be ignored.
Hope this helps:)
