<span> First you need to know how many isotopes there are of silicon, and its average atomic units (look at periodic table). Then make up a system of equations to solve for it. Theres 3 stable silicon isotopes (28, 29, 30) so you will need to have 3 equations. You must be given the percent abundance of at least one of the isotopes to solve because here I can only see 2 equations (numbered down below) set x = percent abundance of si-28 y = percent abundance of si-29 z = percent abundance of si-30 since all of silicon atoms account for 100% of all silicon: x + y + z = 100% = 1 therefore: 1) x = 1 - y - z You also have 2) 28x + 29y + 30z = average atomic mass you can substitute x so that equation becomes: 28 (1 - y - z) + 29y + 30z = average atomic mass See how you have 2 variables here? You cant go on until you know the value of one isotope already or you have given a clue which you can derive the third equation</span>
Balanced chemical reaction: 2K(s) + 2H₂O(l) → 2KOH(aq) + H₂(g).
KOH is inorganic compound p<span>otassium hydroxide, a strong base.
H</span>₂ is hydrogen gas.
In balanced chemical reaction number of atoms on both side of chemical reaction must be same. There are two potassium atoms, four hydrogen atoms and two oxygen atoms on both side of reaction.
Answer:
Field experiments can often have the potential to give scientists opportunities that are not possible in a lab setting.
Explanation:
Having people "act natural" in a lab setting is impossible to truly achieve, as we all know what happens to our mental state and behavior when we are being actively observed. This is also especially helpful when conducting wildlife research, as there are a myriad of different things influencing animal and plant behavior that would be nigh impossible to recreate perfectly in a controlled lab setting.
Field research can have its disadvantages as well, as it is very hard to only have one thing change (make an independent variable) in a wild environment with ever-changing weather, social effects, etc. Also, you, as the researcher, as causing an impact on the very location that you are observing, which can alter your results in unpredictable ways.
The thing to remember is that each type of study has its advantages and disadvantages; if they didn't, then we'd all do the same type of research! You have to weigh your research options and figure out which one works best for your situation :)
Answer:
Explanation:
Replication is crucial to science. Every time researcher find something surprising that has to do with science they replicate it.
Explanation:
(a) The given data is as follows.
Load applied (P) = 1000 kg
Indentation produced (d) = 2.50 mm
BHI diameter (D) = 10 mm
Expression for Brinell Hardness is as follows.
HB =
Now, putting the given values into the above formula as follows.
HB =
=
=
= 200
Therefore, the Brinell HArdness is 200.
(b) The given data is as follows.
Brinell Hardness = 300
Load (P) = 500 kg
BHI diameter (D) = 10 mm
Indentation produced (d) = ?
d = ![\sqrt{(D^{2} - [D - \frac{2P}{HB} \pi D]^{2})}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B%28D%5E%7B2%7D%20-%20%5BD%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B2P%7D%7BHB%7D%20%5Cpi%20D%5D%5E%7B2%7D%29%7D)
= ![\sqrt{(10 mm)^{2} - [10 mm - \frac{2 \times 500 kg}{300 \times 3.14 \times 10 mm}]^{2}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B%2810%20mm%29%5E%7B2%7D%20-%20%5B10%20mm%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B2%20%5Ctimes%20500%20kg%7D%7B300%20%5Ctimes%203.14%20%5Ctimes%2010%20mm%7D%5D%5E%7B2%7D%7D)
= 4.46 mm
Hence, the diameter of an indentation to yield a hardness of 300 HB when a 500-kg load is used is 4.46 mm.