1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
3 years ago
11

Two slits separated by a distance of d = 0.12 mm are located at a distance of D = 0.63 m from a screen. The screen is oriented p

arallel to the plane of the slits. The slits are illuminated by a coherent light source with a wavelength of λ = 540 nm. A wave from each slit propagates to the screen. The interference pattern shows a peak at the center of the screen (m=0) and then alternating minima and maxima. What is the pathlength difference between the waves at the second maximum (m=2) on the screen?
Physics
1 answer:
ikadub [295]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The path-length difference is dsin\theta=1.08*10^{-3}mm

The angle is  \theta = 0.5157^o

Explanation:

  From the question we are told that

             The distance of separation is  d = 0.12 mm = 0.12*10^{-3} m

             The distance from the screen is  D = 0.63 m

              The wavelength is \lambda = 540nm = 540 *10^{-9}m

From the question we can deduce that the the two  maxima's are at the m=0 and m=2

   Now the path difference for this second maxima is mathematically represented as

                   d sin \theta = m \lambda

  Where ddsin\theta is the path length difference

Substituting values

        dsin \theta = 2 * 540*10^{-9}

                 dsin\theta = 1.08*10^{-6}m

converting to mm

               dsin\theta = 1.08*10^{-6} * 1000 mm

                        dsin\theta=1.08*10^{-3}mm

To obtain the angle we make \theta the subject

             \theta = sin ^{-1} [\frac{m \lambda}{d} ]

 Substituting values

             \theta = sin ^{-1} [\frac{1.08*10^{-6}}{0.12*10^-3} ]

               \theta = 0.5157^o

You might be interested in
A skier is accelerating down a 30.0-degree hill at 3.80 m/s^2.
Bond [772]

Answer:

ax = -3.29[m/s²]

ay = -1.9[m/s²]

Explanation:

We must remember that acceleration is a vector and therefore has magnitude and direction.

In this case, it is accelerating downwards, therefore for a greater understanding we will make a diagram of said vector, this diagram is attached.

a_{x}=-3.8*cos(30) = -3.29 [m/s^{2}]\\ a_{y}=-3.8*sin(30) = -1.9 [m/s^{2}]

3 0
3 years ago
I need help, please answer
Burka [1]

This being a perfect collision means no energy is lost during the collision. Because this question asks for speed and not velocity, the speed will be the same because the final energy is the same. The speed after the collision would therefore be 1.27 m/s.

7 0
3 years ago
A camera with a 50.0-mm focal length lens is being used to photograph a person standing 3.00 m away. (a) How far from the lens m
kirill [66]

a) 50.8 mm

b) The whole image (1:1)

c) It seems reasonable

Explanation:

a)

To project the image on the film, the distance of the film from the lens must be equal to the distance of the image from the lens. This can be found by using the lens equation:

\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{q}

where

f is the focal length of the lens

p is the distance of the object from the lens

q is the distance of the image from the lens

In this problem:

f = 50.0 mm = 0.050 m is the focal length (positive for a convex lens)

p = 3.00 m is the distance of the person from the lens

Therefore, we can find q:

\frac{1}{q}=\frac{1}{f}-\frac{1}{p}=\frac{1}{0.050}-\frac{1}{3.00}=19.667m^{-1}\\q=\frac{1}{19.667}=0.051 m=50.8 mm

b)

Here we need to find the height of the image first.

This can be done by using the magnification equation:

\frac{y'}{y}=-\frac{q}{p}

where:

y' is the height of the image

y = 1.75 m is the height of the real person

q = 50.8 mm = 0.0508 m is the distance of the image from the lens

p = 3.00 m is the distance of the person from the lens

Solving for y', we find:

y'=-\frac{qy}{p}=-\frac{(0.0508)(1.75)}{3.00}=-0.0296 m=-29.6mm

(the negative sign means the image is inverted)

Therefore, the size of the image (29.6 mm) is smaller than the size of the film (36.0 mm), so the whole image can fit into the film.

c)

This seems reasonable: in fact, with a 50.0 mm focal length, if we try to take the picture of a person at a distance of 3.00 m, we are able to capture the whole image of the person in the photo.

3 0
3 years ago
Scientist accept ideas of the past and do not try to revise or change them
Vikentia [17]
Is this a question or a statement. This statement would be incorrect. <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Can somebody answer this for me asap!
andreev551 [17]
It shows all except the types of precipitation and created for newspapers
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Helpppppppp please !!!!
    7·1 answer
  • 2. A rock is dropped off a bridge. How fast is the rock
    9·1 answer
  • What is the entropy of a closed system in which 28 distinguishable grains of sand are distributed among 1000 distinguishable equ
    10·1 answer
  • How many lines per mm are there in the diffraction grating if the second order principal maximum for a light of wavelength 536 n
    6·1 answer
  • To travel at constant speed, a car engine provides 24KW of useful power. The driving force on the car is 600N. At what speed doe
    9·1 answer
  • A 3 kg mass object is pushed 0.6 m into a spring with spring constant 210 N/m on a frictionless horizontal surface. Upon release
    14·1 answer
  • 30 points must be a legitimate answer and correct answer or I will report
    6·2 answers
  • A race car accelerates from 16.5 m/s to 45.1 m/s in 2.27 seconds. Determine the acceleration of the car.
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following cars have the most kinetic energy
    11·1 answer
  • Riders on a ferris wheel move in a circle with a speed of 4.0 m/s. As they go around, they
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!