The statement “Only the “Conclusion” section discusses whether the original hypothesis was supported, and both sections suggest further research”, best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer: Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
In research, we do experiments and derive the results. Then, those results were analyzed by us. In this analysis part, we compare our results with the related results published elsewhere. Also, we correlate the similarities and point out the differences between our analysis and other reported results.
In conclusion part, we have to check hypothesis or it supported. And, we summarise our analysis and figure out the further research need to be done on that to improvise our research. So, the final statement is the correct option which best describes the difference between analysis and conclusion.
Answer:
1.33 L.
Explanation:
- We can use the general law of ideal gas: PV = nRT.
where, P is the pressure of the gas in atm.
V is the volume of the gas in L.
n is the no. of moles of the gas in mol.
R is the general gas constant,
T is the temperature of the gas in K.
- If n and T are constant, and have different values of P and V:
<em>(P₁V₁) = (P₂V₂)</em>
<em></em>
Knowing that:
V₁ = 4.0 L, P₁ = 2.0 atm,
V₂ = ??? L, P₂ = 6.0 atm.
- Applying in the above equation
(P ₁V₁) = (P₂V₂)
<em>∴ V₂ = P ₁V₁/P₂</em> = (2.0 atm)(4.0 L)/(6.0 atm) =<em> 1.33 L.</em>
Answer:
40.4 kJ
Explanation:
Step 1: Given data
- Heat of sublimation of CO₂ (ΔH°sub): 32.3 kJ/mol
Step 2: Calculate the moles corresponding to 55.0 g of CO₂
The molar mass of CO₂ is 44.01 g/mol.
n = 55.0 g × 1 mol/44.01 g = 1.25 mol
Step 3: Calculate the heat (Q) required to sublimate 1.25 moles of CO₂
We will use the following expression.
Q = n × ΔH°sub
Q = 1.25 mol × 32.3 kJ/mol = 40.4 kJ