Secondary evidence is the basis for drawing scientific conclusions is this true ir false

2 answers:

7 0

The statement: "secondary evidence is the basis for drawing scientific conclusions" is definitely false. Secondary evidence is the body of information obtained to prove the existence of unknown or missing primary evidence. In drawing scientific conclusions, primary evidence is needed.

wel2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

False

Explanation:

You might be interested in

A generator produces 38 mwmw of power and sends it to town at an rms voltage of 78 kvkv. part a what is the rms current in the t

4vir4ik [10]

The rms current in the transmission lines is I = 487.18 A.

The root-imply-rectangular (rms) voltage of a sinusoidal supply of electromotive force is used to represent the source. it is the rectangular root of the time average of the voltage squared.

Alternating-present day circuits. the root-imply-square (rms) voltage of a sinusoidal source of electromotive force is used to symbolize the supply. it's far the square root of the time average of the voltage squared.

Electric power is by using present day or the waft of electric fee and voltage or the capacity of rate to deliver electricity. A given cost of power can be produced by using any combination of contemporary and voltage values

power = 38 M watt

rms voltage = 78 K v

power = IV

I = power/V

I = (38 * 1000000)/78*1000

I = 487.18 A.

Learn more about rms current here:-brainly.com/question/20913680

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

Issac newton how did he shape the new worldview?

gulaghasi [49]

Accordingly Newton's findings, astronomy and physics have industrialized hugely over the period. Scientists now recognize that every object in the world has a force that draws each other and the power of the force hinge on the mass of the object. Also, Newton's Laws of Motion offer individuals a better understanding of what is likely concerning movement. This is very helpful, particularly in mechanics and space travel. Generally, Newton had a huge and permanent impact on science.

3 0

2 years ago

1. Los Angeles lies on Pacific plate, San Francisco lies on North American plate. When will the two cities meet if the distance

spin [16.1K]

Los Angeles lies on the Pacific plate, San Francisco lies on the North American plate, and the meeting point of the two cities is mathematically given as

T = 120 x 105 years

<h3>What is the meeting point of the two plates?</h3>

Generally, the equation for Distance is mathematically given as

D = Rate x Time

Therefore

T = D/R

T = (600 x 105) / 5

T = 120 x 105 years

In conclusion, the meeting point of the two plates will be

T = 120 x 105 years

Read more about Arithmetic

brainly.com/question/22568180