Answer:
Explanation:
Using the atomic mass of pluonium atoms (244 g/mol), you can calculate the number of atoms in 47.0 g. Then, knowing that each plutonium atom has 96 protons, you calculate the number of protons in the 47.0 g sample. Finally, using the positive charge of one proton, you calculate the total positive charge in the 47.0 g of plutonium.
<u>1. Number of atoms of plutonium in 47.0 g</u>
- Number of moles = mass / atomic mass = 47.0 g / 244 = 0.1926 moles
- Number of atoms = number of moles × 6.022 × 10²³ atoms/mol
- Number of atoms = 0.1926 mol × 6.022 × 10²³ atoms/mol = 1.15998×10²³ atoms
<u>2. Number of protons</u>
- Number of protons = 1.15998×10²³ atoms × 96 protons/atom = 1.11385×10²⁵ protons
<u>3. Charge</u>
<u />
- Charge = charge of one proton × number of protons
- Charge = 1.602×10⁻¹⁹ C/proton × 1.11385×10²⁵ protons = 1.78×10⁶C
Answer:
G. It will take twice as long.
Explanation:
Let's call 
the original speed of the plane and 
the distance between Dallas and Pensacola. The time the plane originally takes to complete the flight is
In this problem, we are told that the plane encounters wind moving at half of its speed: 
, in the opposite direction. This means that the new speed of the plane is
And so, the time the plane takes now to complete the flight is
So, the plane takes twice the time as before.
To summarize, an object moving in uniform circular motion is moving around the perimeter of the circle with a constant speed<span>. While the </span>speed<span> of the object is</span>constant<span>, its </span>velocity<span> is </span>changing<span>. </span>Velocity<span>, being a vector, has a </span>constant<span>magnitude </span>but<span> a </span>changing<span> direction.</span>
Answer:
This a pure case of conflict of interests between the interest of the shareholders who are the original owners of the company and management's interest in earning much more,even if it at the expense of the shareholders.
Explanation:
Management is the entrusted with the day to day affairs of corporations.In carrying out their duty,they must have at the back of their minds that maximization of shareholder's wealth is of top priority.
However.some management teams in a bid to gain undue advantage set their remuneration below reasonable levels.
Ultimately,when this happens, their duty to watch over the investment of shareholders clashes with their interest for personal gains.
You asked the question twice I answered it on the last one
