D.) It is unlikely that a specific cause can be determined, but the treatment would likely be the same in either case.
Coulomb's Law
Given:
F = 3.0 x 10^-3 Newton
d = 6.0 x 10^2 meters
Q1 = 3.3x 10^-8 Coulombs
k = 9.0 x 10^9 Newton*m^2/Coulombs^2
Required:
Q2 =?
Formula:
F = k • Q1 • Q2 / d²
Solution:
So, to solve for Q2
Q2 = F • d²/ k • Q1
Q2 = (3.0 x 10^-3 Newton) • (6.0 x 10^2 m)² / (9.0 x 10^9
Newton*m²/Coulombs²) • (3.3x 10^-8 Coulombs)
Q2 = (3.0 x 10^-3 Newton) • (360 000 m²) / (297 Newton*m²/Coulombs)
Q2 = 1080 Newton*m²/ (297 Newton*m²/Coulombs)
Then, take the reciprocal of the denominator and start
multiplying
Q2 = 1080 • 1 Coulombs/297
Q2 = 1080 Coulombs / 297
Q2 = 3.63636363636 Coulombs
Q2 = 3.64 Coulumbs
The one that would explain why the two groups of scientists got different results is :
They had different specialties and interpreted their data differently
Probably one analyze it with x theory and the other use y theory
hope this helps
Answer:
1.) 274.5v
2.) 206.8v
Explanation:
1.) Given that In one part of the lab activities, students connected a 2.50 µF capacitor to a 746 V power source, whilst connected a second 6.80 µF capacitor to a 562 V source.
The potential difference and charge across EACH capacitor will be
V = Voe
Where Vo = initial voltage
e = natural logarithm = 2.718
For the first capacitor 2.50 µF,
V = Vo × 2.718
746 = Vo × 2.718
Vo = 746/2.718
Vo = 274.5v
To calculate the charge, use the below formula.
Q = CV
Q = 2.5 × 10^-6 × 274.5
Q = 6.86 × 10^-4 C
For the second capacitor 6.80 µF
V = Voe
562 = Vo × 2.718
Vo = 562/2.718
Vo = 206.77v
The charge on it will be
Q = CV
Q = 6.8 × 10^-6 × 206.77
Q = 1.41 × 10^-3 C
B.) Using the formula V = Voe again
165 = Vo × 2.718
Vo = 165 /2.718
Vo = 60.71v
Q = C × 60.71
Q = C
